Ban Inquiries

Post Reply
unban Sheby
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#201

Post by unban Sheby »

Lmao shelby got banned? Why

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#202

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 14:54
Shelby is confused wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 14:20
Why was I banned???

-Shelby
Wow Shelby is like the chillest reg out there. TRA mod strikes again?
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.

justice4shelby
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#203

Post by justice4shelby »

Shelby is confused wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 14:20
Why was I banned???

-Shelby
is this true? pls answer mod

User avatar
AlexCabot
Administrator
Reactions: 11
Posts: 816
Joined: 26 Nov 2018, 00:01

Re: Ban Inquiries

#204

Post by AlexCabot »

Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
1
1 Image

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#205

Post by Guest »

AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Da
And Shelby?...

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#206

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:52
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Da
And Shelby?...
x2

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#207

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 01:06
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:52
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Da
And Shelby?...
x2
x3. This is just ridiculous.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#208

Post by Guest »

AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
I searched for her posts and saw that she wasn't registered, she just used that name to post as guest. Here's one of her posts. viewtopic.php?t=15138&start=11375#p2740789 I just find it strange she suddenly stopped posting. Pretty sure she was banned for talking about gender ideology like numerous other posters in Dominique Provost-Chalkley thread.

Shelby is annoyed
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#209

Post by Shelby is annoyed »

AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#210

Post by Guest »

Mod can't give a single explanation to a long time reg why she was banned? :nervous:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#211

Post by Guest »

Even STMTH has been online and posting on the board in the time since Shelby asked her question, and it then got asked multiple times on her behalf. Other mods too. It's not laziness at this point, the board staff treat the users here with plain contempt.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#212

Post by Guest »

Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
Shelby have you no idea of why you've banned?
I don't mean to argue, I'm just asking. I know I can't ask mods why they banned you but I can ask you if you have any idea.
So please, if you have, would you share it?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#213

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 15:23
Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
Shelby have you no idea of why you've* banned?
I don't mean to argue, I'm just asking. I know I can't ask mods why they banned you but I can ask you if you have any idea.
So please, if you have, would you share it?
SA *you've been fixed

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#214

Post by Guest »

:eyeroll: You must know this place's unwritten rules by now, peeps. You do not mention some mythical other places. Ever. You don't even fantasise about them. They don't exist anyway.

justice4shelby
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#215

Post by justice4shelby »

Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
x2

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#216

Post by Guest »

Mods, there is crazy F spam in The tiktok thread and a person who is talking about a minor named Jay doing sex work. pls delete these posts.

viewtopic.php?p=3523093#p3523093
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=75468&start=27475#p3523123
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=75468&start=27510#p3523160
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=75468&start=27510#p3523173

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#217

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:34
Even STMTH has been online and posting on the board in the time since Shelby asked her question, and it then got asked multiple times on her behalf. Other mods too. It's not laziness at this point, the board staff treat the users here with plain contempt.
X2 I don't get it. They can't even respond to a simple question. You should have reason to ban someone, especially a reg member.

User avatar
STMTH
Administrator
Reactions: 27
Posts: 533
Joined: 11 Aug 2018, 05:15

Re: Ban Inquiries

#218

Post by STMTH »

Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
I banned your account. :smurf:
1
1 Image
:smurf:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#219

Post by Guest »

And why did she get banned?

Shelby side-eyeing Smurf
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#220

Post by Shelby side-eyeing Smurf »

STMTH wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:21
Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#221

Post by Guest »

Shelby side-eyeing Smurf wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:56
STMTH wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:21
Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45
Guest wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 18:52
Must be the same reason Wayhaughtshipper18 was banned. Talked too much sense about the gender cult. Fuck those mods.
I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?
Please unbanned her smurf.

User avatar
STMTH
Administrator
Reactions: 27
Posts: 533
Joined: 11 Aug 2018, 05:15

Re: Ban Inquiries

#222

Post by STMTH »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:59
Shelby side-eyeing Smurf wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:56
STMTH wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:21
Shelby is annoyed wrote:
08 Jul 2021, 14:09
AlexCabot wrote:
07 Jul 2021, 23:45

I see no record of this user ever existing.

I see a Wayhaughtshipper17, who is not on any banlist, and hasnt posted since November. It is possible that their IP was banned, or that they got caught in a range ban which connects to IP and not username. But the username itself is not banned.
Seriously? You respond about a user who doesn't exist but can't offer a single explanation for why I was banned?

WTF mods
I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?
Please unbanned her smurf.
I decline.
:smurf:

User avatar
STMTH
Administrator
Reactions: 27
Posts: 533
Joined: 11 Aug 2018, 05:15

Re: Ban Inquiries

#223

Post by STMTH »

Shelby side-eyeing Smurf wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:56
[quote=STMTH post_id=3523599 time=1625808099 user_id=7702

I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?
[/quote]
1
1 Image
:smurf:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#224

Post by Guest »

You can get banned for that? :rofl:
Nah. Unban Shelby.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#225

Post by Guest »

You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#226

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:23
You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:
lol ikr? psycho male trolls let loose in this forum everyday but smufy ban a long time reg because she hurt her feelings :rofl:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#227

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:30
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:23
You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:
lol ikr? psycho male trolls let loose in this forum everyday but smufy ban a long time reg because she hurt her feelings :rofl:
Funny though. I would love shelby to moderate this forum. I trust her than any admins and she's a certified lesbian :gaypimp:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#228

Post by Guest »

Does nothing to correct the reasons why users would want to move to a different board but will ban users for floating the idea and then be all smug about it.

Is it any fucking wonder this place is a mess when that's the approach to running it.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#229

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:53
Does nothing to correct the reasons why users would want to move to a different board but will ban users for floating the idea and then be all smug about it.

Is it any fucking wonder this place is a mess when that's the approach to running it.
X2

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#230

Post by Guest »

:yawn: Told y'all Smurf was a troll. The ultimate Our Lady of the Perpetual Butthurt. She will punish the "community" for her own failures.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#231

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:38
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:30
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:23
You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:
lol ikr? psycho male trolls let loose in this forum everyday but smufy ban a long time reg because she hurt her feelings :rofl:
Funny though. I would love shelby to moderate this forum. I trust her than any admins and she's a certified lesbian :gaypimp:
DA Seriously. This place would be soooo much better in every way if all the moderators were like Shelby.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#232

Post by Guest »

STMTH wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:08
Shelby side-eyeing Smurf wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:56
[quote=STMTH post_id=3523599 time=1625808099 user_id=7702

I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?

[/quote]

DA OMG you are such a petty asshole and I almost can't believe you'll just admit it upfront like you're proud of being like this. Shelby has long been one of the very best people on this board who actually signs her name and you expect this weird kind of absolute loyalty while always refusing to be transparent about how this place runs.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#233

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 07:29
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:38
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:30
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:23
You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:
lol ikr? psycho male trolls let loose in this forum everyday but smufy ban a long time reg because she hurt her feelings :rofl:
Funny though. I would love shelby to moderate this forum. I trust her than any admins and she's a certified lesbian :gaypimp:
DA Seriously. This place would be soooo much better in every way if all the moderators were like Shelby.
Shelby deserve better.Shame on u mods

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#234

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 07:33
STMTH wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:08
Shelby side-eyeing Smurf wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:56
[quote=STMTH post_id=3523599 time=1625808099 user_id=7702

I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?
DA OMG you are such a petty asshole and I almost can't believe you'll just admit it upfront like you're proud of being like this. Shelby has long been one of the very best people on this board who actually signs her name and you expect this weird kind of absolute loyalty while always refusing to be transparent about how this place runs.
[/quote]

Preach 🙌

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#235

Post by Guest »

Lol and then they want regs to step up to be moderators, while at the same time they ban all the trusty regs for bullshit reasons. :facepalm:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#236

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 07:18
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:53
Does nothing to correct the reasons why users would want to move to a different board but will ban users for floating the idea and then be all smug about it.

Is it any fucking wonder this place is a mess when that's the approach to running it.
X2
X3

SMTH, I thought your goal was for lesbians to move to a different board since you and your mods keep randomly banning people just for having an opinion. Why surprised Shelby said that?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#237

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 07:29
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:38
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:30
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:23
You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:
lol ikr? psycho male trolls let loose in this forum everyday but smufy ban a long time reg because she hurt her feelings :rofl:
Funny though. I would love shelby to moderate this forum. I trust her than any admins and she's a certified lesbian :gaypimp:
DA Seriously. This place would be soooo much better in every way if all the moderators were like Shelby.
Gotta say, when it was announced that they're looking for new mods, my thought was that I hope Shelby volunteers.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#238

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 11:07
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 07:29
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:38
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:30
Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:23
You banned her because of that, compared to homophobic post? :argh: :rage:
lol ikr? psycho male trolls let loose in this forum everyday but smufy ban a long time reg because she hurt her feelings :rofl:
Funny though. I would love shelby to moderate this forum. I trust her than any admins and she's a certified lesbian :gaypimp:
DA Seriously. This place would be soooo much better in every way if all the moderators were like Shelby.
Gotta say, when it was announced that they're looking for new mods, my thought was that I hope Shelby volunteers.
smurf kinda fucked this up because shelby is quite likeable here. she's a legit lesbian and not a tra. can't say the same with the mods in here :nails:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#239

Post by Guest »

Is that even a rule on the l chat? :hmmm:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#240

Post by Guest »

I join the chorus of asking TPTB to please reinstate Shelby. Of all the people to ban here, Shelby is definitely NOT one of them. :eyeroll:

Can't you take a joke? This is ridiculous and shows very poor judgment on your part. <_<

Do the right thing. Bring Shelby back. She's one of the good people here. I already miss her sense of humor and camaraderie. :'(

Dragonfish
Member
Reactions: 54
Posts: 893
Joined: 08 Jun 2020, 07:15

Re: Ban Inquiries

#241

Post by Dragonfish »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 13:02
I join the chorus of asking TPTB to please reinstate Shelby. Of all the people to ban here, Shelby is definitely NOT one of them. :eyeroll:

Can't you take a joke? This is ridiculous and shows very poor judgment on your part. <_<

Do the right thing. Bring Shelby back. She's one of the good people here. I already miss her sense of humor and camaraderie. :'(
I agree with this. She was a nice user and it’s not as though she was linking anyone to another forum. Pretty sure it was said in jest. Please reconsider SMTH?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#242

Post by Guest »

WTF is wrong with u smurf.You should ban the fucking male trolls, tra and bislut in this fucking forum...

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#243

Post by Guest »

STMTH wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 06:08
Shelby side-eyeing Smurf wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 05:56
[quote=STMTH post_id=3523599 time=1625808099 user_id=7702

I banned your account. :smurf:
Why? Still no explanation?

[/quote]

You a whole troll :rofl: :rofl:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#244

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
09 Jul 2021, 13:02
I join the chorus of asking TPTB to please reinstate Shelby. Of all the people to ban here, Shelby is definitely NOT one of them. :eyeroll:

Can't you take a joke? This is ridiculous and shows very poor judgment on your part. <_<

Do the right thing. Bring Shelby back. She's one of the good people here. I already miss her sense of humor and camaraderie. :'(
x2. Please unban Shelby. She is important contributor of this forum.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#245

Post by Guest »

Perhaps, the mod is a tra, agreeing to all the homophobic/misogynic bs in the name of "trans rights," and have been gunning for shelby for a long time waiting for an excuse to ban her. And the mod finally got "it." In any reasonable cases, Shelby should've been a mod for the Transexual thread, not some ramdo mod with an agenda banning n deleting as they please from the T thread. It's just a matter of time, this forum will be The Q Chat and another hand-over space for queers and trans. Lesbians, we really need to regroup and think about it before our spaces get permanently erased.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#246

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 18:49
Perhaps, the mod is a tra, agreeing to all the homophobic/misogynic bs in the name of "trans rights," and have been gunning for shelby for a long time waiting for an excuse to ban her. And the mod finally got "it." In any reasonable cases, Shelby should've been a mod for the Transexual thread, not some ramdo mod with an agenda banning n deleting as they please from the T thread. It's just a matter of time, this forum will be The Q Chat and another hand-over space for queers and trans. Lesbians, we really need to regroup and think about it before our spaces get permanently erased.
Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?

Forums evolve. For that matters, nations evolve. When the USA was founded, only white male land-owners 21 or over could vote. Now it's any citizen 18 or over, white or no, male or no, land owning or no.

This started out at the L chat but we can't even agree on what constitutes the L. Just let it expand already in the name of inclusivity. For that matter, nobody seems to worry about white male land-owner "space" getting erased either.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#247

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:03
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 18:49
Perhaps, the mod is a tra, agreeing to all the homophobic/misogynic bs in the name of "trans rights," and have been gunning for shelby for a long time waiting for an excuse to ban her. And the mod finally got "it." In any reasonable cases, Shelby should've been a mod for the Transexual thread, not some ramdo mod with an agenda banning n deleting as they please from the T thread. It's just a matter of time, this forum will be The Q Chat and another hand-over space for queers and trans. Lesbians, we really need to regroup and think about it before our spaces get permanently erased.
Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?

Forums evolve. For that matters, nations evolve. When the USA was founded, only white male land-owners 21 or over could vote. Now it's any citizen 18 or over, white or no, male or no, land owning or no.

This started out at the L chat but we can't even agree on what constitutes the L. Just let it expand already in the name of inclusivity. For that matter, nobody seems to worry about white male land-owner "space" getting erased either.
DA. "Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?", also you: *brings up US history to compare to the lchat*

Btw
STMTH wrote:
01 Jul 2021, 00:23
There are no new policies. The forum TOS outlines the scope of this forum. This is not a trans forum.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#248

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:13
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:03
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 18:49
Perhaps, the mod is a tra, agreeing to all the homophobic/misogynic bs in the name of "trans rights," and have been gunning for shelby for a long time waiting for an excuse to ban her. And the mod finally got "it." In any reasonable cases, Shelby should've been a mod for the Transexual thread, not some ramdo mod with an agenda banning n deleting as they please from the T thread. It's just a matter of time, this forum will be The Q Chat and another hand-over space for queers and trans. Lesbians, we really need to regroup and think about it before our spaces get permanently erased.
Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?

Forums evolve. For that matters, nations evolve. When the USA was founded, only white male land-owners 21 or over could vote. Now it's any citizen 18 or over, white or no, male or no, land owning or no.

This started out at the L chat but we can't even agree on what constitutes the L. Just let it expand already in the name of inclusivity. For that matter, nobody seems to worry about white male land-owner "space" getting erased either.
DA. "Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?", also you: *brings up US history to compare to the lchat*

Btw
STMTH wrote:
01 Jul 2021, 00:23
There are no new policies. The forum TOS outlines the scope of this forum. This is not a trans forum.
Not sure what to tell you except that evolution is fact, not opinion. (As Smurfy might have put it, the US Constitution outlines the scope of this "forum" - nation - as well.)

Things change. That's a fact.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#249

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:38
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:13
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:03
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 18:49
Perhaps, the mod is a tra, agreeing to all the homophobic/misogynic bs in the name of "trans rights," and have been gunning for shelby for a long time waiting for an excuse to ban her. And the mod finally got "it." In any reasonable cases, Shelby should've been a mod for the Transexual thread, not some ramdo mod with an agenda banning n deleting as they please from the T thread. It's just a matter of time, this forum will be The Q Chat and another hand-over space for queers and trans. Lesbians, we really need to regroup and think about it before our spaces get permanently erased.
Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?

Forums evolve. For that matters, nations evolve. When the USA was founded, only white male land-owners 21 or over could vote. Now it's any citizen 18 or over, white or no, male or no, land owning or no.

This started out at the L chat but we can't even agree on what constitutes the L. Just let it expand already in the name of inclusivity. For that matter, nobody seems to worry about white male land-owner "space" getting erased either.
DA. "Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?", also you: *brings up US history to compare to the lchat*

Btw
STMTH wrote:
01 Jul 2021, 00:23
There are no new policies. The forum TOS outlines the scope of this forum. This is not a trans forum.
Not sure what to tell you except that evolution is fact, not opinion. (As Smurfy might have put it, the US Constitution outlines the scope of this "forum" - nation - as well.)

Things change. That's a fact.
Cool. Are you an admin?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Ban Inquiries

#250

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:40
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:38
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:13
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 19:03
Guest wrote:
10 Jul 2021, 18:49
Perhaps, the mod is a tra, agreeing to all the homophobic/misogynic bs in the name of "trans rights," and have been gunning for shelby for a long time waiting for an excuse to ban her. And the mod finally got "it." In any reasonable cases, Shelby should've been a mod for the Transexual thread, not some ramdo mod with an agenda banning n deleting as they please from the T thread. It's just a matter of time, this forum will be The Q Chat and another hand-over space for queers and trans. Lesbians, we really need to regroup and think about it before our spaces get permanently erased.
Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?

Forums evolve. For that matters, nations evolve. When the USA was founded, only white male land-owners 21 or over could vote. Now it's any citizen 18 or over, white or no, male or no, land owning or no.

This started out at the L chat but we can't even agree on what constitutes the L. Just let it expand already in the name of inclusivity. For that matter, nobody seems to worry about white male land-owner "space" getting erased either.
DA. "Oh good God, must you be so dramatic?", also you: *brings up US history to compare to the lchat*

Btw
STMTH wrote:
01 Jul 2021, 00:23
There are no new policies. The forum TOS outlines the scope of this forum. This is not a trans forum.
Not sure what to tell you except that evolution is fact, not opinion. (As Smurfy might have put it, the US Constitution outlines the scope of this "forum" - nation - as well.)

Things change. That's a fact.
Cool. Are you an admin?
I don't believe that's relevant.

I'm speaking to the nature of forums generally. Overly rigid forums don't make it. Those that do, evolve. This is the context in which this current administration is choosing to roll.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ffvideo, Flopmop, Google Adsense [Bot], Hamstermoony, Idonthaveaname, mcdumbass, nicorobin, pumpkinfluffernutter49, saltydawg, Yadom and 916 guests