The plot twist if she goes to play for Chicago
US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Kerr isn’t coming back to the NWSL until she wins the champions league. That’s if she even comes back. Kerr is here to be a wag while she’s in off season that’s it. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:08The plot twist if she goes to play for Chicagoor would they loan her to Gotham? People have been joking that she might go on loan to Gotham. But she has international duty in like one month, that’s very little time to spend with an NWSL club.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
?? What does asking why she is shown there as the 9 despite fans saying she was playing the 6 have to do with race? The trolls in here are insane smh. DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
? This screws ACFC more than Houston, it means they play Houston at home in a midweek game in between playing Portland and Louisville away on either side of that game. This arguably ensures LA drops points not the other way around. DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Neither but probably LA more since that puts their traveling fans out. Da
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Probably thought it was supposed to be a game at houston based on how the tweet is written.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:31? This screws ACFC more than Houston, it means they play Houston at home in a midweek game in between playing Portland and Louisville away on either side of that game. This arguably ensures LA drops points not the other way around. DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
I agree with that, if I was coach Alex would be dropped for Hatch. But that doesn’t mean there’s room for Syd, she’s been out of the picture so long and isn’t exactly young, she’s not worth investing time into to reintegrate into the team, especially when she can be very inconsistent. In terms of syd coming back from pregnancy though, she did get call ups, the problem was she wasn’t better than Dunn and Mal who were basically her replacements. Alex wasn’t performing well either but the difference is Vlatko didn’t have a replacement waiting at the ready. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 19:15Sydney is objectively better than Alex, But was never given the chance to come back after pregnancy even after outplaying Alex every year on their own club team. I think that’s what makes people mad and cheer hard for her, especially Orlando fans. She has a really good attitude and work so hard. It must have been really frustrating for her to watch them roll out the carpet for another player she was outperforming. But the nt has never been about current performance levels. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 18:28DA. Syd’s overrated imo, her fans think she’ll somehow get back with the NT but that will just never happen. She’s a great league player but she’s not outstanding either. I can’t blame her for having a bad game outside of the goal though, she has no help on her team. Orlando’s POTS is looking like it’ll be Erin so far.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Anyone else get the email she’s referring to?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Da. No, they assumed the league was trying to give ACFC a leg up actually because the tweet was not vague and it takes 5 seconds to see where the game used to be located. Just laziness on their part I guess.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:33Probably thought it was supposed to be a game at houston based on how the tweet is written.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:31? This screws ACFC more than Houston, it means they play Houston at home in a midweek game in between playing Portland and Louisville away on either side of that game. This arguably ensures LA drops points not the other way around. DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Games are always written as Home team-Away Team.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:38Da. No, they assumed the league was trying to give ACFC a leg up actually because the tweet was not vague and it takes 5 seconds to see where the game used to be located. Just laziness on their part I guess.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:33Probably thought it was supposed to be a game at houston based on how the tweet is written.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:31? This screws ACFC more than Houston, it means they play Houston at home in a midweek game in between playing Portland and Louisville away on either side of that game. This arguably ensures LA drops points not the other way around. DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:00Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
They need a better graphic designer I’ve seen Twitter stans make better graphics than what SD puts outGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?

Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Cluff may not be as known because she was recently married; her maiden name is Colohan. She was one of three finalists for the 2022 Hermann Trophy, along with Howell & Turnbow. BYU made it to the finals of the College Cup 2022, losing to Florida State and Howell, with Colohan playing attacking mf, as she did last game; playing in the middle of 4-2-3-1. She's a strong lefty with solid skills. She beat Turnbow and SCU in the semifinals last December in Santa Clara. She's only been to one camp, u17, so she does have to shine more to get in the mix for ROTY. I'm holding out for Amanda turning the Pride around by the second half with or without a fresh group of internationals. Wondering why they just extended McLeod to 2024.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:02Cluff is the dark horse of the rookies. She could really break out once she gets more experience (and ideally a better team + playing in her actual position).
Not that the others aren’t good. But players like Girma/Howell/Turnbow have all been in the youth NT system for a while and played on the U-whatever teams so they’re more well known.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
They have to do a save of the game to fill a required sponsorship agreement.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
It’s weird that they don’t show what the save is though isn’t it? Like all this shows is a picture of Sheridan and it says she made 5 saves… what is their “save of the game”? That’s what the post is and the sponsorship is for…I question a lot of SD’s social media decisions. At least they aren’t as bad as what Washington used to be. DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:02Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:00Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
The post says it’s for save of the game but they don’t even show or specify what the save is. Doesn’t that defeat the purpose? They might as well call it the “goalkeeper of the game” award lol. Da
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
The only pertinent part just says:Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:35Anyone else get the email she’s referring to?
Due to scheduling changes at Banc of California Stadium, our match against the Houston Dash, originally scheduled for Wednesday, June 15 has been moved to Tuesday, June 7.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Any post can be sponsored though, why call it the “save of the match” award when they don’t even tell us which save won? That’s like giving out the Budweiser POTM award to a specific person but just showing a picture of the entire team. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:25Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:02Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:00Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Like them both. Weaver is left-footed, but can strike with both. Sanchez cannot use her left and always goes right.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:28Any post can be sponsored though, why call it the “save of the match” award when they don’t even tell us which save won? That’s like giving out the Budweiser POTM award to a specific person but just showing a picture of the entire team. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:25Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:02Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:00Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?

Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
X2 it’s so weird giving a save of the match award but not saying what the save was. SD needs a new SM team. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:28Any post can be sponsored though, why call it the “save of the match” award when they don’t even tell us which save won? That’s like giving out the Budweiser POTM award to a specific person but just showing a picture of the entire team. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:25Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:02Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:00Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:51
Lmao why does SD present a “save of the game” when there’s only one player they ever give it to (Sheridan), and they don’t even specify which “save”?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
That’s a wrong assumption… I am a SD fan and have lived there my entire life. I still think it’s stupid having a save of the week award but not mentioning what the save that won the award is. That’s like giving Tom Hanks a best actor award but not saying what it was for… don’t you see why people find it stupid? Sorry I don’t suck up to everything my team does like others in here.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:37Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:28Any post can be sponsored though, why call it the “save of the match” award when they don’t even tell us which save won? That’s like giving out the Budweiser POTM award to a specific person but just showing a picture of the entire team. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:25Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:02Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:00
Because technically it could be given to someone else, let’s say if a defender had a goal line save they’d probably win it. Or games where Sheridan won’t be there then someone else will win, also it’s obviously for the sponsorship .Why you care so much, when you are not even the fan of the SD?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Yup. Who gives out a save of the match award but doesn’t show the save that won it? Imagine if the NWSL did that for save of the week they’d get so much shit. It being a sponsored post doesn’t take away the fact that it’s a weird post. They can post the save and still have the sponsorship on it. That’s what the nwsl does. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:49That’s a wrong assumption… I am a SD fan and have lived there my entire life. I still think it’s stupid having a save of the week award but not mentioning what the save that won the award is. That’s like giving Tom Hanks a best actor award but not saying what it was for… don’t you see why people find it stupid? Sorry I don’t suck up to everything my team does like others in here.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:37Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:28Any post can be sponsored though, why call it the “save of the match” award when they don’t even tell us which save won? That’s like giving out the Budweiser POTM award to a specific person but just showing a picture of the entire team. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:25Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:02
Obviously for the sponsorship yes but why don’t they at least say what the “save of the game” was and show the video? Otherwise it literally is just the yay goalkeeper award. DaWhy you care so much, when you are not even the fan of the SD?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Granny Alex and Pinoe could never
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
X2 you can have sponsored posts while still showing what the post is for. Why have a “save of the game” if you don’t even show what it is? DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:54Yup. Who gives out a save of the match award but doesn’t show the save that won it? Imagine if the NWSL did that for save of the week they’d get so much shit. It being a sponsored post doesn’t take away the fact that it’s a weird post. They can post the save and still have the sponsorship on it. That’s what the nwsl does. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:49That’s a wrong assumption… I am a SD fan and have lived there my entire life. I still think it’s stupid having a save of the week award but not mentioning what the save that won the award is. That’s like giving Tom Hanks a best actor award but not saying what it was for… don’t you see why people find it stupid? Sorry I don’t suck up to everything my team does like others in here.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:37Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:28Any post can be sponsored though, why call it the “save of the match” award when they don’t even tell us which save won? That’s like giving out the Budweiser POTM award to a specific person but just showing a picture of the entire team. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 21:25
Because I don’t think many people are that worried about it, they know it’s for a sponsorship so they like the post and move right along with their day.Why you care so much, when you are not even the fan of the SD?
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Pinoe would get winded trying to run that far she wouldn’t even try. Alex could run back but she’d to too slow it wouldn’t matter.

Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Like when she tried to run down Fox last night. She gave up about half way. Da
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
I don’t wanna insult another player
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Beat them by pushing them in the back. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:25Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Professional fouls. Newbies should learn about them. She did actually get her foot on the ball first thoughGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:26Beat them by pushing them in the back. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:25Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.

DA
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Press isn’t “Alex and Pinoe” is she? Press has wheels, girlie was schooling Rodman all night, it was very fun to watch. I’d love to see them play on opposing flanks with the NT, although knowing Vlatko he’d start Cat at the 9 so Rodman and Press would have to wait around for their slow 9 to catch up all game. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Why are you calling Alex a granny when she’s younger than Press? Just because she sucks doesn’t mean she’s a granny.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:25Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Lol did you watch the game? Press outran her all game. That foul was a professional foul because Lussi got beat… that’s what coaches tell players to do and happens in soccer everywhere. Shouldn’t of been a yellow though she got the ball. DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:26Beat them by pushing them in the back. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:25Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Granny in this context isn’t age, it’s fitness. Pressy is 33 but she can keep up with the early 20 year olds, can’t say the same about Alex or Pinoe (or Heath) can we? DAGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:29Why are you calling Alex a granny when she’s younger than Press? Just because she sucks doesn’t mean she’s a granny.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:25Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
She’s got granny fitness. DaGuest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:29Why are you calling Alex a granny when she’s younger than Press? Just because she sucks doesn’t mean she’s a granny.Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:25Where was Press mentioned? Anon talked about Pinoe and Morgan, and it’s true. Press may be a vet but she ain’t a granny, she can actually keep up with the newbies (and beat them).Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:21Didn't Rodman give up after chasing Press and gesture for the coaches to sub her out? The commentators were even laughing & joking about it.
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
X3 Rodman and Sanchez will be a scary duo for our NT in years to come. Cat may have the hype but those two will likely go on to do better things. Vladdy should try Sanchez at false 9, that way the entire front 3 can be fast, Cat is as slow as Alex. Da
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
Is Christie Rampone still engaged to Christy Holly?Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 22:37
Re: US Women's Soccer - Part XVIII: USWNT, NWSL, NCAA
The game remaining on the original date was the exact same scenario. They would have played a midweek home game playing away games on either side so it just changes which week they have that happening…Guest wrote: ↑19 May 2022, 20:31? This screws ACFC more than Houston, it means they play Houston at home in a midweek game in between playing Portland and Louisville away on either side of that game. This arguably ensures LA drops points not the other way around. DA
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 00099, ffvideo, kellymuses, Petitlu, Villanelle171, Yadom and 1593 guests