Transsexuals

Locked
Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45651

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45652

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45653

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 12:25
I though Mermaids also pretty much believes that kids should be transed on demand too.

As for the alleged lack of a need for diagnosis, nowhere in the world do operations take place or are drugs prescribed without a medical diagnosis and simply on the basis of "the fact that we want to".

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45654

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 11:52
I wanna put this on a tote bag

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45655

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 12:35
Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 12:25
I though Mermaids also pretty much believes that kids should be transed on demand too.

As for the alleged lack of a need for diagnosis, nowhere in the world do operations take place or are drugs prescribed without a medical diagnosis and simply on the basis of "the fact that we want to".
Mermaids went through the old "user to staff" pipeline, just when Suzie became the boss users were moms with GNC kids, then Mermaids became a youth-oriented organization (as seen from their secret discords where they sent binders to minors) and now the decisions are taken by blue-haired twenty-somethings who had been taught to distrust their parents/elders and to call every woman over forty a "Karen".

It's evident that they don't want a diagnosis, and I think that Suzie agreeing it's not only a confirmation of her beliefs about gender, but also a try to show that she's still "on their side" about this. I wouldn't be surprised if she tried to re-enter the org in some capacity. And btw, where's her son? It's years he doesn't show his face in public. Probably he became even more masculinized like Hunter Schafer, only that he has gained weight because of estrogens and now looks like an eunuch.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45656

Post by Guest »

Yes, Susie's son disappeared from public view a few years ago, which suggests he's not as happy with what happened to him as is often proclaimed.

The other big question is just why was she suddenly sacked by Mermaids? She was accused of transphobia, racism, all the new generic woke violations, which sounds like a cover for getting rid of her. They must be worried about the investigation into governance at Mermaids.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45657

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45658

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45659

Post by Guest »

That tranny lover swimmer Erica lost in ncaa swimming today when she's the clear favorite LMAO
Too busy sucking tranny dicck
Yes it's the event that William won last year, Erica prolly would thank and praise William if she won it so fuck you erica

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45660

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 12:25
‘Fantasy diagnosis to transition’ :hmmm:

The only fantasy here is that they think it’s actually possible to transition!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45661

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 23:43
That tranny lover swimmer Erica lost in ncaa swimming today when she's the clear favorite LMAO
Too busy sucking tranny dicck
Yes it's the event that William won last year, Erica prolly would thank and praise William if she won it so fuck you erica
She's the worst TRA hope she flops in everything

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45662

Post by Guest »

I just heard that March 31st is the made up "Trans Day of Visibility". What in the actual fuck? The last day of Women's History month is being overrun by those posers?

Women really can't have anything to ourselves.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45663

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
16 Mar 2023, 23:43
That tranny lover swimmer Erica lost in ncaa swimming today when she's the clear favorite LMAO
Too busy sucking tranny dicck
Yes it's the event that William won last year, Erica prolly would thank and praise William if she won it so fuck you erica
🤭 Love to see it 😍

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45664

Post by Guest »

Go VOTE!!


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45665

Post by Guest »

It's funny how trans-identified males obsess so much about "passing," exchanging tips with each other on how to appear more feminine, undergoing multiple "facial feminization" surgeries and so on, and are then seemingly oblivious that they reveal themselves completely in how they interact with others, men and women. Public trans people like the author and academic Daniel "Grace" Lavery will be interviewed by a man, and relate to that interviewer as a man, and vice versa; the dynamic is completely that of two males, even though the interviewer respectfully uses the female name and pronouns. You can't hide or fake the type of chemistry you have with others, and with TIMs it's always so blatant. It's in everything: their dismissiveness of women's boundaries, their likely unconscious competition with the male interviewer to get the most screentime or be the sharpest or wittiest. They will always use their maleness to their advantage.

See: Owen Jones and Katy Montgomerie. Jones relates to Katy (né Colin) completely as a fellow (gay) male, whether he's aware of it or not.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45666

Post by Guest »

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/susan- ... ge-genders

Just a reminder that more voice should be given how autism is not being dealt with correctly when it comes to trans youth.
Susan Bradley: How trans activists are unethically influencing autistic children to change genders
The trans movement is crossing ethical lines with a vulnerable subset of youth struggling with issues of gender identity, writes child psychiatrist Susan Bradley

User avatar
Too-Ticki
Moderator
Reactions: 108
Posts: 756
Joined: 07 Jun 2019, 09:36

Re: Transsexuals

#45667

Post by Too-Ticki »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45668

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45669

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 09:03
Trans of past did not get as vile as this GenZ lot


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45670

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 09:03
Thank you for exposing yourself DOVE!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45671

Post by Guest »

The people who like to proclaim that "trans people have always existed" and "are not going anywhere" and who deny that there is any ideology behind it all always ignore the fact that the idea that trans women/men are *exactly the same* as their "cis" counterparts and that sex is "assigned at birth" are relatively novel ideas (in any case, they gained currency less than 15 years ago). They ignore the reflexive inclination by proponents of this movement to silence dissent and that, of the many reasonable arguments one might have against these ideas, most are dismissed by its proponents as gross bigotry.

Also, non-trans people referring to themselves as "cisgender" would be the equivalent of the vast majority of the world population consistently referring to themselves as "gentile" or "goyim," as if the perspective of a tiny minority (in this case, Jews) were the predominant one.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45672

Post by Guest »

There are so many reasons why "trans people have always existed" is bullshit that I can't go into them all right now. A main one is that they can't even agree with each other on what "trans" means (is gender a construct or is it innate?). Another big reason is that "transitioning" was never even possible until the 20th century, when the drugs and surgery were developed. Then there's the bullshit claim that if "gender-affirming health care" is denied then all these little kids as well as adults will commit suicide. If this was true, then there would be countless cases of these suicides throughout history. Except there are none, nor are there cases of suicide in countries that don't trans kids (i.e. most countries in the world). In fact, there is no historical evidence for transism or nonbinarism. Cross-dressing for various purposes is not "trans".

Also, until about the mid-20th century, discrimination against women in all societies around the world was so great, with serious legal as well as social/cultural discrimination and women having fewer rights. Which man pined to lose his rights as a man and become an oppressed woman? In a sense, the trans movement is only possible today because the legal/social distinctions between men and women are now so few that men wouldn't be losing anything by pretending to be women (this isn't to say that sexism and misogyny are no longer thriving; they clearly are, the TRAs being one example of that, and for many gay men identifying as trans is the result of internalised homophobia).

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45673

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45674

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 13:43
He gets off on making his mother participate in his sexual fetishes.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45675

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 11:37
The people who like to proclaim that "trans people have always existed" and "are not going anywhere" and who deny that there is any ideology behind it all always ignore the fact that the idea that trans women/men are *exactly the same* as their "cis" counterparts and that sex is "assigned at birth" are relatively novel ideas (in any case, they gained currency less than 15 years ago). They ignore the reflexive inclination by proponents of this movement to silence dissent and that, of the many reasonable arguments one might have against these ideas, most are dismissed by its proponents as gross bigotry.

Also, non-trans people referring to themselves as "cisgender" would be the equivalent of the vast majority of the world population consistently referring to themselves as "gentile" or "goyim," as if the perspective of a tiny minority (in this case, Jews) were the predominant one.
DA Its also just straight up bullshit too.
The things they recite to prove trans have always existed are things like two spirit & third genders. The thing is those cultures back then were so aggressively conservative men who were effeminate or gay were kicked out of the “male” gender and put into “third gender” or “two spirit” It was also a gender that homosexual men, prostituted boys & men, castrated men & intersex people would be put in.

Ofc nothing has changed really. Still, those who do not conform to gender & the patriarchies ideas of the ideal man and woman are booted into the “trans” role.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45676

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45677

Post by Guest »

It's weird that the trans never attack straight men for not being attracted to transwomen and their pen!ses, just lesbians.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45678

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 16:06
It's weird that the trans never attack straight men for not being attracted to transwomen and their pen!ses, just lesbians.
Exactly. Their expectations are always centered on women and their wrath is always directed against women, while men seem to get a pass. I don't even think men are really expected to accept trans-identified females as men; it's enough if they just tolerate (or even completely ignore) them.

That said, TIMs *will* sometimes accuse straight men of being "chasers" (see: India Willoughby/Graham Linehan) out of spite or based on wishful thinking.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45679

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 16:06
It's weird that the trans never attack straight men for not being attracted to transwomen and their pen!ses, just lesbians.
Well tbf, they do ocasionally. But never so aggresively and persistenly as their straight counterparts. Trannies aren't dumb, they're degenerates but not dumb, they pick on lesbians because they perceive us as weaker, both physically and mentally, and therefore easier to coerce.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45680

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45681

Post by Guest »

Steven Carl McCasland is a playwright, musician, director dedicated to telling the stories of remarkable women and their contributions throughout history. :hmmm:
https://www.stevencarlmccasland.com/

Was so dedicated, it transitioned :rofl:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45682

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45683

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45684

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 16:54
Guest wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 16:06
It's weird that the trans never attack straight men for not being attracted to transwomen and their pen!ses, just lesbians.
Well tbf, they do ocasionally. But never so aggresively and persistenly as their straight counterparts. Trannies aren't dumb, they're degenerates but not dumb, they pick on lesbians because they perceive us as weaker, both physically and mentally, and therefore easier to coerce.
It's also because most of them are straight dudes so they don't want to fck men

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45685

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45686

Post by Guest »

https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/03/17/ ... situation/
Unafraid of backlash, retaliation, or cancellation, three accomplished male athletes are denouncing the discriminatory policies that allow males who identify as “transgender women” to compete in women’s sports. They say that biological differences in the sexes pose far too many competitive advantages for men and those policies blur the lines between male- and female-only spaces, breaching the privacy of all athletes.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45687

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45688

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45689

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45690

Post by Guest »

Good to hear the summary of the day in Melbourne where unfortunately NAZI men crashed the #Letwomenspeak rally. Apparently the TRA/trannys were hitting horses underneath and the police asked her to end the talks sooner. Abuse of animals is vile. A woman was knocked unconscious and had to go to hospital.


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45691

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45692

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
18 Mar 2023, 10:34
Good to hear the summary of the day in Melbourne where unfortunately NAZI men crashed the #Letwomenspeak rally. Apparently the TRA/trannys were hitting horses underneath and the police asked her to end the talks sooner. Abuse of animals is vile. A woman was knocked unconscious and had to go to hospital.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45693

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45694

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
18 Mar 2023, 10:54
He's been watching too much of Jeffrey Marche's style. Same side head, pauses and intonation. :rofl:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45695

Post by Guest »

Can some of the tweets go under spoilers? Especially the ones that are re-quoted.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45696

Post by Guest »

Why. I can see them OK what's the problem :hmmm:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45697

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
18 Mar 2023, 17:30
Why. I can see them OK what's the problem :hmmm:
If your internet isn't quality it takes forever to load the page if it's heavy on tweets.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45698

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
18 Mar 2023, 13:58
The one good thing is that the athletes appealed to the committee to keep him out of the locker rooms because he's male, and they were accommodated. He couldn't change with them before the competition, and he couldn't shower and change with them after.

Apparently they see it as an encouraging step to argue that if he's male in the lockers, he can't be female on the track. Thing is, recently the Italian Democratic Party elected as a new secretary a woman who is completely captured by American liberal(pro-trans) values. She already made clear what her thoughts about self-id and sex work, so I really fear that a left-leaning government will open the door to other Petrillos. Or it will encourage more people to vote for right wing parties and honestly I don't know what's worse for us women.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45699

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
18 Mar 2023, 18:14
Guest wrote:
18 Mar 2023, 17:30


Why. I can see them OK what's the problem :hmmm:
If your internet isn't quality it takes forever to load the page if it's heavy on tweets.
3rd world issues dictate 1st world issues. As compared to 1st world trannies telling 3rd world trannies that there is pain being a penised lesbian compared to the bigger infringement of XX rights.

What a world we live in.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#45700

Post by Guest »


Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diotima1, Google [Bot] and 639 guests