Transsexuals

Locked
Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28176

Post by Guest »

Sentry wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 19:00
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 12:43
Once again, Sentry is obsessively deleting posts she deems "off topic", just like what is happening with other threads. Note to Sentry, it's ok for a topic to stray off track for a bit, the main topic would still be about trannies, or such discussions will end soon enough. Shining a light on the new Twitter CEO isn't some devastating topic we shouldn't touch on.
I'm not the only mod who ventures over to this thread. I PC'd (I'm in the middle of a move) and have restored the deleted posts as you are correct.

Please use the complaints thread for stuff like this in the future.
Respectfully,

Do you mods communicate with each other?
Do you make yourselves aware of the purpose for the existence of topics?
Can a mod call out a TRA mod and report her/him to STMTH?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28177

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:27
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Patrisse Cullors, another one of the BLM founders, is also in a relationship with a queer, non-binary female (a Canadian...).

I didn't know about Garza, though, thanks. Garza actually seems to have split up with the TIF, Malachi Garza. They were together from 2003 to 2021.

I wonder if Malachi Garza identified as trans back in 2003.
DA Interesting. How many BLM founders are there? At least two of them being/having been in a serious relationship with a TIF seems like a really odd statistical anomaly even for woke/SJW circles unless there's at least a couple hundred of them.

abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28178

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:58
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:27
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Patrisse Cullors, another one of the BLM founders, is also in a relationship with a queer, non-binary female (a Canadian...).

I didn't know about Garza, though, thanks. Garza actually seems to have split up with the TIF, Malachi Garza. They were together from 2003 to 2021.

I wonder if Malachi Garza identified as trans back in 2003.
DA Interesting. How many BLM founders are there? At least two of them being/having been in a serious relationship with a TIF seems like a really odd statistical anomaly even for woke/SJW circles unless there's at least a couple hundred of them.
It's almost like I have a slight suspicion, based off how much money in corporate donations BLM is raking in, that they purposefully pick up the most unhinged octogender partners to get another million or two out of trans and kweer liberal corps and their spending, on top of monetizing the black struggle.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28179

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:58
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:27
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Patrisse Cullors, another one of the BLM founders, is also in a relationship with a queer, non-binary female (a Canadian...).

I didn't know about Garza, though, thanks. Garza actually seems to have split up with the TIF, Malachi Garza. They were together from 2003 to 2021.

I wonder if Malachi Garza identified as trans back in 2003.
DA Interesting. How many BLM founders are there? At least two of them being/having been in a serious relationship with a TIF seems like a really odd statistical anomaly even for woke/SJW circles unless there's at least a couple hundred of them.
I read there are 3 founders. DA

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28180

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Lol, I though their money went to buying houses for the people in charge. Oh well.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28181

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Do you see who you rewteet??? Conservative catholic pro life... :fool: probably racist too but it's not in her bio.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28182

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Do you see who you rewteet??? Conservative catholic pro life... :fool: probably racist too but it's not in her bio.
Mmm, you know what they say about assuming?!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28183

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28184

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28185

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28186

Post by Guest »

Thread


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28187

Post by Guest »

"Male competitive advantage may be fair and proportionate in women's sport"

That's really what the IOC is saying, in a nutshell.




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28188

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:35
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Do you see who you rewteet??? Conservative catholic pro life... :fool: probably racist too but it's not in her bio.
Mmm, you know what they say about assuming?!
Is that all you take away from what I just wrote? The Catholic pro-life conservatives MAGA (it's in her bio) are as much my enemies as the TRA's no more and no less. I still have an ethic.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28189

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:15
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:35
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Do you see who you rewteet??? Conservative catholic pro life... :fool: probably racist too but it's not in her bio.
Mmm, you know what they say about assuming?!
Is that all you take away from what I just wrote? The Catholic pro-life conservatives MAGA (it's in her bio) are as much my enemies as the TRA's no more and no less. I still have an ethic.
You mean you still have an extreme leftist ideology apart from the trans issue. :rofl: Its people who assume and declare anyone they don't like racists, bigots and nazi that have given the TRAs their power because like you they rarely take a critical eye to anything they just assume like you have done. You are the type that will fall for the next "oppression" fad. :rofl:

If you want to call people racist or bigoted...bring on something bigots or racist they have said.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28190

Post by Guest »

Thank you Dawkins!




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28191

Post by Guest »




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28192

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:23
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:15
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:35
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Do you see who you rewteet??? Conservative catholic pro life... :fool: probably racist too but it's not in her bio.
Mmm, you know what they say about assuming?!
Is that all you take away from what I just wrote? The Catholic pro-life conservatives MAGA (it's in her bio) are as much my enemies as the TRA's no more and no less. I still have an ethic.
You mean you still have an extreme leftist ideology apart from the trans issue. :rofl: Its people who assume and declare anyone they don't like racists, bigots and nazi that have given the TRAs their power because like you they rarely take a critical eye to anything they just assume like you have done. You are the type that will fall for the next "oppression" fad. :rofl:

If you want to call people racist or bigoted...bring on something bigots or racist they have said.
Cool fanfic sis.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28193

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:24
Thank you Dawkins!



No, "thank you Katy" lol

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28194

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:28


Yes, it's very weird framing and it doesn't even go into the worst of what Harrop did.

Not sure why it even needs two journalists to write, and they are both apparently freelancers.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28195

Post by Guest »




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28196

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:43
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:24
Thank you Dawkins!
No, "thank you Katy" lol
Haha, you're right, thanks to Monty too! :P

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28197

Post by Guest »



Thread



Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28198

Post by Guest »

"trans rights doesn't take anything from women" :eyeroll:


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28199

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 12:07
"trans rights doesn't take anything from women" :eyeroll:
^ and they say this while complaining about a women's right petition.

abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28200

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 10:52
I'm not sure what the up to date contemporary gender shitscience has to say on this (that we are born without a gender and it's the repressive past life social conditioning which forces us to deny ourselves a whole range of beautiful kinks and sexual deviations that only the chosen TIMs manage to break free from?), but I absolutely reject the notion that a cross-dressing teenager would get sexual arousal from watching himself prance around in female clothing without being exposed to the external idea that opposite sexes clothing has sexual value in itself. It always comes with very very specific attire choices from the TIMs as well, you'll never hear of them jerking off in a mirror while wearing a cardigan, a bathrobe, or a pareo - it would be a slutty catholic nun pouting for a selfie, a burqa draped wh*re in disguise waiting for muslim horndogs to inseminate his twitter, a wannabe bimbo with a Chad build, squeezing himself into what bimbos wear because they are hoes, man, or an office jezebel wearing red heels and fishnets cosplay attempt.

I can imagine a boy with an actual dysphoria or lack of particular attachment to boy clothing feeling more mentally comfortable or more aesthetically attracted to wearing dresses and princessing up in a totally asexual way, but there's nothing innately seductive about everyday outdoor clothing, the sexualization part comes as a product of jealous, sexually formed AGP men seeing women dressed in that clothing attract male attention.

Everything else is either premature porn exposure, or layers of fucked up parenting and various direct and indirect kinds of abuse, or lying by omission to chalk their kink on biology, the same way sexual orientation is largely considered a biological, inborn trait.

TIMs literally never bring up how early most of them get hooked up on the tranny porn, looking for a quick dopamine fix to spice up their uneventful incel existence, and you really have to wait until the dumb younger ones slip up on tiktok to get going viral for a moment, or until someone dating a TIM during his straight man phase learns what their partner is into and decides to share what they discovered in that browsing history once the initial shock of their BF trooning out wears off.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28201

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 12:25
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 12:07
"trans rights doesn't take anything from women" :eyeroll:
^ and they say this while complaining about a women's right petition.
Lesbians talking about sexual coersion is anti-trans
Women's rights are anti-trans

Typical male thinking.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28202

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 09:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:06
I’m fairly new to this thread so maybe some of you knew about this. I was reading an article about how BLM’s funds go towards supporting transgender organizations and then today I found out one of the BLM founders, Alicia Garza (on the right) is married to a TIF (on the left).
Do you see who you rewteet??? Conservative catholic pro life... :fool: probably racist too but it's not in her bio.
I didn't retweet them, genius. I just posted the tweet to this thread. The religion and political beliefs of the twitter account doesn't change the fact that Alicia Garza was married to Malachi Garza who is a TIF. Another anon posted the breakup post on the previous page.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28203

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28204

Post by Guest »

Quote tweets




abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28205

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:08
I'm howling at their hormonally medicated braincells post-humously transing a straight man whose dress stands against everything they culturally, socially and sexually normalize with so much purely psychotic persuasion.

Howling x 10 at this beautiful reply:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28206

Post by Guest »

Laurie unmasking more and more

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28207

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:17
Laurie unmasking more and more
She's so stupid my gooooooood, like Jameela Jamil but even worse

abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28208

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:17
Laurie unmasking more and more
Lorry is a fucking twitter parasite, I just can't at her hiding hands every time when called out, in the same repetitive and annoying bullshit comeback script that never really evolves.

She's like a brain-eating gender amoeba hissing "I'm, like, SO DEEPLY SORRY my neverly implied insinuations got misunderstood by YOU.... A G A I N... but I would, of course, take enoughly of my valuablest time to [i]E X P L A I N[/i] where YOUR lying eyes have betrayed you this time..." - and the cycle repeats every several weeks.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28209

Post by Guest »

Not a religion, not a cult

(a lot of good replies too)


abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28210

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:51
Not a religion, not a cult

(a lot of good replies too)

Trans people invented wheat?????????

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28211

Post by Guest »

abolish transwomen wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:53
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:51
Not a religion, not a cult

(a lot of good replies too)
Trans people invented wheat?????????
Pretty sure "they" is supposed to be god, who of course is a they/them nonbinary.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28212

Post by Guest »

Trans invented the wheel, and fire and writing.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28213

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 14:46
Trans invented the wheel, and fire and writing.
Trans women are the real women. They invent feminism.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28214

Post by Guest »

abolish transwomen wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:53
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 13:51
Not a religion, not a cult

(a lot of good replies too)

Trans people invented wheat?????????
I think this idiot (being trans and therefore having no concept of human biology and the point of humans being dimorphic, as well as possibly having mutilated their genitals) forgot that the act of creation is our parents fucking.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28215

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 14:51
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 14:46
Trans invented the wheel, and fire and writing.
Trans women are the real women. They invent feminism.
ikr

abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28216

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 14:54
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 14:51
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 14:46
Trans invented the wheel, and fire and writing.
Trans women are the real women. They invent feminism.
ikr
He thinks with that bleached wig????????

My sincere condolences to the women is his choir who will be forcibly subjected to participating in his yodeling hobby.

abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28217

Post by abolish transwomen »

abolish transwomen wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:37
My sincere condolences to the women **is in his choir who will be forcibly subjected to participating in his yodeling hobby.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28218

Post by Guest »

THE WORST

:fool: :fool: :fool:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28219

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:46
THE WORST

:fool: :fool: :fool:
And trooner will be making Labour even more of a laughing stock than they already are.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28220

Post by Guest »

Would bet real hard cash this person does not in fact have a disorder of sexual development.


abolish transwomen
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28221

Post by abolish transwomen »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:46
THE WORST
He really is.

I did a quick little search for our queen in the neo-vagina monologues archive that is his twitter, and he writes so much shit through the absolutely mental tranny prism of seeing everyone out there as "eggs", troons-in-denial and troons-in-disguise:



It's not even funny that he does not understand the concept of adopting a writer's pseudonym while every twitter tranny out there on twitter is perpetually one heart attack away from dying of being deadnamed.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28222

Post by Guest »

Thread




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28223

Post by Guest »

Looks like the really glaring omission of JK Rowling might have backfired


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28224

Post by Guest »

Lol, all books sell at a reduced price at some point, that's how the whole book market works. Rowling/Galbraith will draw other buyers into the store.

I downloaded Troubled Blood onto my Kindle just today to start reading it. My girlfriend paid full price for it when it first came (i.e. the much higher price set for Kindle when a book is first published, which is almost the same price as the hardback) because she was so desperate to read it.

Does that idiot Steph think George Elliot was trans too?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#28225

Post by Guest »


Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diotima1, Google [Bot], Trust-me and 613 guests