Transsexuals

Locked
Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38001

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 04:10


I guess now she is in a relationship with this trans woman(aka a man with a d--- who wears makeup) 🀒
It's probably her drug dealer/"partying friend"/voodoo fixer to curse haters/whatever the hell else, but if they're fucking it wouldn't surprise me if she was a bihet, baiting for LGB loyalty and accidentally killing her screen career with first coming out, this entire time.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38002

Post by Guest »

^ There's absolutely no suggestion in that photo that they're in a relationship or having sex.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38003

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 09:11
^ There's absolutely no suggestion in that photo that they're in a relationship or having sex.
There's absolutely no suggestion in my comment that I particularly care, or require any further clarification of my point; there's a reason I typed down three other assumptions first. :heart:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38004

Post by Guest »



She hates herself as a woman but she can't change the fact that she will always be a woman.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38005

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 09:28


She hates herself as a woman but she can't change the fact that she will always be a woman.
This torso looks photoshopped as hell. Looks like she's transplanted a Ken doll torso on herself and called it a day.

What a sad day. I sincerely hope she finds peace - be it by mutilating her body or seeking therapy a few years down the line once the euphoria of her transition has worn off and Hollywood goes back to ignoring her.

I really loved hard candy and I can't even bring myself to watch it again knowing what she's done to herself. No amount of surgery and hormone will give her satisfaction, her body was never the issue, it's society's expectations/perception of her based on her being a woman that was/is the real problem. And guess what? That perception won't change now that she's got plastic abs and pecs. The wakeup call is going to be dramatic.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38006

Post by Guest »

I mean I get what you are saying about "society" but part of being a functional adult to learning to operate in that society and sometimes playing the game to succeed in the world. Like KStew...I'm sure isn't that into dressing up like a Barbie for Hollywood but she has found her niche and made it work for her instead of turning it into a traumatic burden like Ellen Page did. She could have work a suit and cut her hair as a woman and sold that style had she felt comfortable with herself.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38007

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 10:12
I mean I get what you are saying about "society" but part of being a functional adult to learning to operate in that society and sometimes playing the game to succeed in the world. Like KStew...I'm sure isn't that into dressing up like a Barbie for Hollywood but she has found her niche and made it work for her instead of turning it into a traumatic burden like Ellen Page did. She could have work a suit and cut her hair as a woman and sold that style had she felt comfortable with herself.
Oh I'm not defending Ellen's decision to transition, I'm sorry if it came off that way. You're absolutely right that part of being an adult is learning to navigate in that society, and play the game. But we're not all equals when it comes to that, mentally speaking, I mean. Ellen's always struck me as emotionally fragile and given what she went through as a child actor and how it messed her up... It's no wonder she's been trying to scrub herself out of her femaleness. I'm not defending her, though. She's thrown all of us under the bus with her nonsensical interviews and "I've always been a man inside/I like feeling strong" bullshit. Like I said, she's still in the euphoria stage, we'll see how it is in ten years. It took her seven years to retcon her lesbianism. Might take her just as long to realize that she's mutilated her body over nothing.

User avatar
Too-Ticki
Moderator
Reactions: 108
Posts: 756
Joined: 07 Jun 2019, 09:36

Re: Transsexuals

#38008

Post by Too-Ticki »

1
1 Image

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38009

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 10:41
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 10:12
I mean I get what you are saying about "society" but part of being a functional adult to learning to operate in that society and sometimes playing the game to succeed in the world. Like KStew...I'm sure isn't that into dressing up like a Barbie for Hollywood but she has found her niche and made it work for her instead of turning it into a traumatic burden like Ellen Page did. She could have work a suit and cut her hair as a woman and sold that style had she felt comfortable with herself.
Oh I'm not defending Ellen's decision to transition, I'm sorry if it came off that way. You're absolutely right that part of being an adult is learning to navigate in that society, and play the game. But we're not all equals when it comes to that, mentally speaking, I mean. Ellen's always struck me as emotionally fragile and given what she went through as a child actor and how it messed her up... It's no wonder she's been trying to scrub herself out of her femaleness. I'm not defending her, though. She's thrown all of us under the bus with her nonsensical interviews and "I've always been a man inside/I like feeling strong" bullshit. Like I said, she's still in the euphoria stage, we'll see how it is in ten years. It took her seven years to retcon her lesbianism. Might take her just as long to realize that she's mutilated her body over nothing.
Oh I agree with what you are saying especially re Ellen's mental fragility. I do think we are failing kids these days in not teaching them more resilience and coping strategies. I do worry about the glamourisation of having various "mental illness" and identities.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38011

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:23
Oh I agree with what you are saying especially re Ellen's mental fragility. I do think we are failing kids these days in not teaching them more resilience and coping strategies. I do worry about the glamourisation of having various "mental illness" and identities.
** Commercialization.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38012

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:30
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:23
Oh I agree with what you are saying especially re Ellen's mental fragility. I do think we are failing kids these days in not teaching them more resilience and coping strategies. I do worry about the glamourisation of having various "mental illness" and identities.
** Commercialization.
Yeah should had added that too. Fair point.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38013

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:33
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:30
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:23
Oh I agree with what you are saying especially re Ellen's mental fragility. I do think we are failing kids these days in not teaching them more resilience and coping strategies. I do worry about the glamourisation of having various "mental illness" and identities.
** Commercialization.
Yeah should had added that too. Fair point.
I'm always re-emphasizing that part because without the $$$ in child and adult transing we would have been over the 200 pronouns subculture the moment tumblr ran out of steam back in 2018. Maybe a year later, but by the time covid had rolled in, no one would be giving a shit about the violence of being misgendered. Yet we're still here, and it's just as bad.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38014

Post by Guest »

Too-Ticki wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:14
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
Imagine being that delusional...

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38015

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:40
Too-Ticki wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:14
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
That his clinic would at least warn him of a risk of unexpectedly leaking shit out of his ass and having no control over that, and likely no fix for damaged neural function responsible for his β“‘β“β“‘β“‘β“˜β“” β“‘β“β“’β“šβ“—β“žβ“›β“” working biologically correctly?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38016

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:51
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:40
Too-Ticki wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:14
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
That his clinic would at least warn him of a risk of unexpectedly leaking shit out of his ass and having no control over that, and likely no fix for damaged neural function responsible for his β“‘β“β“‘β“‘β“˜β“” β“‘β“β“’β“šβ“—β“žβ“›β“” working biologically correctly?
This person is obviously mentally ill. No sane person would even think doing this.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38017

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:01
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:51
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:40
Too-Ticki wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:14
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
That his clinic would at least warn him of a risk of unexpectedly leaking shit out of his ass and having no control over that, and likely no fix for damaged neural function responsible for his β“‘β“β“‘β“‘β“˜β“” β“‘β“β“’β“šβ“—β“žβ“›β“” working biologically correctly?
This person is obviously mentally ill. No sane person would even think doing this.
DA No shit he is mentally ill, but professionals still need to do their duty of informing their patients of the potential risks and outcome of procedures they’re looking to get

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38018

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:14
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:01
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:51
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:40
Too-Ticki wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:14
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
That his clinic would at least warn him of a risk of unexpectedly leaking shit out of his ass and having no control over that, and likely no fix for damaged neural function responsible for his β“‘β“β“‘β“‘β“˜β“” β“‘β“β“’β“šβ“—β“žβ“›β“” working biologically correctly?
This person is obviously mentally ill. No sane person would even think doing this.
DA No shit he is mentally ill, but professionals still need to do their duty of informing their patients of the potential risks and outcome of procedures they’re looking to get
Da. And more importantly when the patient is mentally ill or suffer any kind of mental development problems it is crucial that they are not just told, but that they comprehend the information they are given. That's part of good healthcare. I'm not saying this wasn't done here, but it should be taken into consideration too.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38019

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:01
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:51
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:40
Too-Ticki wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:14
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
That his clinic would at least warn him of a risk of unexpectedly leaking shit out of his ass and having no control over that, and likely no fix for damaged neural function responsible for his β“‘β“β“‘β“‘β“˜β“” β“‘β“β“’β“šβ“—β“žβ“›β“” working biologically correctly?
This person is obviously mentally ill. No sane person would even think doing this.
I perceive him as either severely self-hating (as the article is suggesting), or severely dysphoric, and not in the performative Ellen "Don't you see that I'm a victim!!!!" Page kind, and I'm glad he is speaking out because for the most part TIMs only want to get their dicks sucked and be happily jerking off in the few remaining lesbian spaces, and this is only second article on my mind that talks about how brutal bottom surgery is for biological males.

This should have more exposure.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38020

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38021

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 05:36
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 05:00
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 01:24
In what world is this a happy person?
She looks depressed and in 5-10 years she will regret this decision
That's not depression, she's on something.

Depressed people don't have this sort of visible detachment from their environment, her facial response lags behind the hosts' questions.
She’s so concerned with β€˜passing’ and acting like a man that she’s not present in the conversation. It’s sad.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38022

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 13:01
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 05:36
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 05:00
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 01:24
In what world is this a happy person?
She looks depressed and in 5-10 years she will regret this decision
That's not depression, she's on something.

Depressed people don't have this sort of visible detachment from their environment, her facial response lags behind the hosts' questions.
She’s so concerned with β€˜passing’ and acting like a man that she’s not present in the conversation. It’s sad.
All I think about is her PA must have been a horrible person in their past life, imagine having to wrangle this kite in public.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38023

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:28
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:14
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:01
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:51
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 11:40
What did he expect ? :blinkwide:
That his clinic would at least warn him of a risk of unexpectedly leaking shit out of his ass and having no control over that, and likely no fix for damaged neural function responsible for his β“‘β“β“‘β“‘β“˜β“” β“‘β“β“’β“šβ“—β“žβ“›β“” working biologically correctly?
This person is obviously mentally ill. No sane person would even think doing this.
DA No shit he is mentally ill, but professionals still need to do their duty of informing their patients of the potential risks and outcome of procedures they’re looking to get
Da. And more importantly when the patient is mentally ill or suffer any kind of mental development problems it is crucial that they are not just told, but that they comprehend the information they are given. That's part of good healthcare. I'm not saying this wasn't done here, but it should be taken into consideration too.
Yep. I work in healthcare and informed consent (as in being warned of every single negative consequence of a procedure and the patient demonstrating that they fully understand these risks) is a big deal... except for when it comes to this, apparently.

Also, I had body dysmorphic disorder from my mid-teens to early twenties and every time I sought out plastic surgery for imagined flaws I was turned down for being unsuitable due to obvious mental health issues. Why tf should it be any different with SRS? That seems mad. I feel terribly sorry for this man and others who have surgery regrets.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38024

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 13:01
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 05:36
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 05:00
Guest wrote: ↑
23 Jun 2022, 01:24
In what world is this a happy person?
She looks depressed and in 5-10 years she will regret this decision
That's not depression, she's on something.

Depressed people don't have this sort of visible detachment from their environment, her facial response lags behind the hosts' questions.
She’s so concerned with β€˜passing’ and acting like a man that she’s not present in the conversation. It’s sad.
Seth meyers looks like a man and it must be so obvious to her that she doesn't, she must be constantly distressed at having to convince everyone she is a man. And the post surgery photos look terrible. Whatever is going on in the US is crazy - I'm glad more women are speaking up.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38025

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:54
preach

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38026

Post by Guest »



#Wrong

And all those TV shows and films that show tiny women beating the hell out of average men... #DelusionalFiction !

I reckon the poor women should 'accidentally' knee them in the balls!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38027

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 14:22
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:54
preach
And they constantly peddle the idea that anyone on the outside hates them and wants them dead. The only place that is safe is to stay within the bounds of the sect because the outside is awful and cruel.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38028

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 14:44
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 14:22
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 12:54
preach
And they constantly peddle the idea that anyone on the outside hates them and wants them dead. The only place that is safe is to stay within the bounds of the sect because the outside is awful and cruel.
And if you disagree they'll stab you in the dark alley and burn the places you go out to eat and drink while the woke mob is cherishing the oppressed.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38029

Post by Guest »

The tweets are now starting to roll in about how striking down Roe v Wade is, of course, part of a broader attack on… uh… trans people.

β€œwomen”? β€” Oh really? Huh. Like we know what they are?

Ah yes. So connected.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38030

Post by Guest »

Give me a fucking break. β€œPolicing a woman’s body” omfg you have to be truly brian dead to make this connection. I can’t. We are so fucked because both sides are absolutely awful and hate women in their own unique, different way.

Also β€œanti-gender”??? what in the fuck? What does that even mean?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38031

Post by Guest »

They make everything about them. :yawn:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38032

Post by Guest »

Roe vs Wade turned and they are make it about themselves.
I knew men who called themselves women were annoying and misogynist but now now women who believe they're men are replying to every comment saying transmen or "men have abortions" .So being called a she makes them depressed but nor giving birth?

Transsexuals have ruined everything for women. The same orgs that back up trans scholarships are promoting only fans for women.

I hate how my generation (Gen Z) got lied by Millennials. It's always the "leftist""she/it/xem/furry" "🌹" "transrights" "pro porn" "free Palestine" "acab" "kpop" crowd.

The most famous trans (Jenner) supported Trump but now they want to play the victim.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38033

Post by Guest »

Why is Stonewall UK tweeting about abortion rights in a completely different country? Abortion isn't under threat in the UK, nor is same-sex marriage. Stonewall UK is threatening our rights our same-sex attracted people in the UK (and Europe, as different European countries tend to copy each other on the latest "progressive" thing).

It's kinda hypocritical for them to feign any concern for same-sex anything, given how much they attack the very concept of biological sex. More like they're trying to get attention for themselves and make themselves sound relevant.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38034

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 18:20
The tweets are now starting to roll in about how striking down Roe v Wade is, of course, part of a broader attack on… uh… trans people.

β€œwomen”? β€” Oh really? Huh. Like we know what they are?

Of course. Just like the Ukraine war had the deepest impact on trannies, so does this. No one is a bigger victim than them.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38035

Post by Guest »

Sick of all these Democratic politicians tweeting about "people" and "someone" needing an abortion, with no mention anywhere of women. Even Barack Obama is doing it. Do they really think they are going to save abortion rights by erasing women? They are so fucking out-of-touch. How will they protect same-sex marriage if they don't even believe in biological sex?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38036

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 19:16
Sick of all these Democratic politicians tweeting about "people" and "someone" needing an abortion, with no mention anywhere of women. Even Barack Obama is doing it. Do they really think they are going to save abortion rights by erasing women? They are so fucking out-of-touch. How will they protect same-sex marriage if they don't even believe in biological sex?
This is exactly why I’m so angry today. How can these educated people not see the connection between their refusal to fight for and center women with what’s happening to them. If they delude themselves into thinking this affects other people, that helps? That makes them care more? Yikes.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38037

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 19:16
Sick of all these Democratic politicians tweeting about "people" and "someone" needing an abortion, with no mention anywhere of women. Even Barack Obama is doing it. Do they really think they are going to save abortion rights by erasing women? They are so fucking out-of-touch. How will they protect same-sex marriage if they don't even believe in biological sex?
I just read Barack Obama's statement and he explicitly refers to women multiple times, and only women. Nothing about "pregnant people". Gavin Newsom too.

So who is doing it?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38038

Post by Guest »

Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38039

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
It is under the same legal umbrella. I am no activist, but am going to get involved now.

If you do not think it is under the same umbrella, please tell me what covers lesbians right to be lesbians in the privacy of their own home? You get they destroyed even the right of women to get contraception? Nothing underpinning that now. Pass any law they want in the red states and nothing to stop it. Of course they will outlaw trans ASAP. Tennessee already banned trans from women sports even before today. Now they can outlaw trans, because there is no longer a fundamental right to privacy. You all live in some freaking bubble.

Please, name the laws that allow the minority lesbians not to be oppressed by the majority. Name it or shut your mouth about gaslighting - you are the guys out here gaslighting.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38040

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:28
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
It is under the same legal umbrella. I am no activist, but am going to get involved now.

If you do not think it is under the same umbrella, please tell me what covers lesbians right to be lesbians in the privacy of their own home? You get they destroyed even the right of women to get contraception? Nothing underpinning that now. Pass any law they want in the red states and nothing to stop it. Of course they will outlaw trans ASAP. Tennessee already banned trans from women sports even before today. Now they can outlaw trans, because there is no longer a fundamental right to privacy. You all live in some freaking bubble.

Please, name the laws that allow the minority lesbians not to be oppressed by the majority. Name it or shut your mouth about gaslighting - you are the guys out here gaslighting.
What does being a female and a lesbian have to do with being a man who calls himself a woman?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38041

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:28
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
It is under the same legal umbrella. I am no activist, but am going to get involved now.

If you do not think it is under the same umbrella, please tell me what covers lesbians right to be lesbians in the privacy of their own home? You get they destroyed even the right of women to get contraception? Nothing underpinning that now. Pass any law they want in the red states and nothing to stop it. Of course they will outlaw trans ASAP. Tennessee already banned trans from women sports even before today. Now they can outlaw trans, because there is no longer a fundamental right to privacy. You all live in some freaking bubble.

Please, name the laws that allow the minority lesbians not to be oppressed by the majority. Name it or shut your mouth about gaslighting - you are the guys out here gaslighting.
Please tell me how a woman will have a right to a same SEX marriage once Biden erases female beings completely and starts protecting men who feel like women instead. The only people making this about something it’s not is you, as you are in the transsexual discussion thread talking about abortion rights for WOMEN being removed, which doesn’t affect mentally ill men at all. Please take your disgust for women to the politics thread. You won’t fool anyone here.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38042

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
x2.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38043

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 23:26
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
x2.
x3

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38044

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38045

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
25 Jun 2022, 00:39
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 23:26
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
x2.
x3

This all comes under how females are losing ground in women's rights. Although it's different from trans madness at its core us taking women's rights, spaces, voices etc away from them. Stop gaslighting people yourself who might be seeing a bigger picture going on here. Now they have come for females in the straight community, let's see how vocal the rights of women will become. Or, will they handmaiden themselves yet again to the alt right?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38046

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
25 Jun 2022, 02:50
Or, will they handmaiden themselves yet again to the alt right?
They probably would want to try it, but no one wants them over there.

Alt-right doesn't need female validation, unlike tranny activism, that slithered its way into feminism and presented itself as some ground-breaking struggle for the actual female rights.

Alt right bros are self-sufficient, and their handmaidens don't speak for them, they're too busy in the kitchen to tweet all day long.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38047

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 18:20
The tweets are now starting to roll in about how striking down Roe v Wade is, of course, part of a broader attack on… uh… trans people.
Twenty minutes online today, and I've already seen several het handmaidens wailing that "this is not just the abortion and reproductive rights, this will ALSO affect transpeople and our vulnerable youth!!"

I wonder how long it will take them to realize that trannies are out there doing the best out of all groups they're trying to lump together to maintain the illusion of social unity or whatever other collective struggle those idiots have imagined to make them feel better about unapologetic tranny support that gives them nothing back and has eroded their own sex-based rights at this points.

If they think that repubs are idiots, the right have simply observed how easily liberal women give away their own sex-based protections, and they went in after a half-decade of this shit not being opposed.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38048

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
Do you really think that the "don't say woman" crowd in the US are going to be able to defend abortion rights?

Here's just one way in which they're connected in the US: average voters in the US can see the harm the trans madness is doing every day in their kids' school. They might care about abortion rights, but it's a distant issue from them and one they will probably never need. They don't even know anyone who's ever needed an abortion. In their state, abortions may still be legal.

Who is that average voter going to vote for in the mid-terms, the Republican candidates who say they're going to limit trans medical interventions on children and protect girls' sports or the Democratic candidates who are trying to make a big issue out of abortion rights but can't even say they word "woman", and who also keep banging on about "gender-affirming health care for trans kids"?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38049

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
25 Jun 2022, 05:53
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
Do you really think that the "don't say woman" crowd in the US are going to be able to defend abortion rights?

Here's just one way in which they're connected in the US: average voters in the US can see the harm the trans madness is doing every day in their kids' school. They might care about abortion rights, but it's a distant issue from them and one they will probably never need. They don't even know anyone who's ever needed an abortion. In their state, abortions may still be legal.

Who is that average voter going to vote for in the mid-terms, the Republican candidates who say they're going to limit trans medical interventions on children and protect girls' sports or the Democratic candidates who are trying to make a big issue out of abortion rights but can't even say they word "woman", and who also keep banging on about "gender-affirming health care for trans kids"?
I don't think any woman doesn't have some kind of relation to abortion. We all have friends or family whose been in a situation where they've had to make that decision. If you haven't then it's because you don't listen to the women in your life or because the women in your life doesn't trust you.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#38050

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: ↑
25 Jun 2022, 06:15
Guest wrote: ↑
25 Jun 2022, 05:53
Guest wrote: ↑
24 Jun 2022, 22:20
Abortion has nothing to do with trans madness. Don't listen to activists who want to gaslight you into believing that.
Do you really think that the "don't say woman" crowd in the US are going to be able to defend abortion rights?

Here's just one way in which they're connected in the US: average voters in the US can see the harm the trans madness is doing every day in their kids' school. They might care about abortion rights, but it's a distant issue from them and one they will probably never need. They don't even know anyone who's ever needed an abortion. In their state, abortions may still be legal.

Who is that average voter going to vote for in the mid-terms, the Republican candidates who say they're going to limit trans medical interventions on children and protect girls' sports or the Democratic candidates who are trying to make a big issue out of abortion rights but can't even say they word "woman", and who also keep banging on about "gender-affirming health care for trans kids"?
I don't think any woman doesn't have some kind of relation to abortion. We all have friends or family whose been in a situation where they've had to make that decision. If you haven't then it's because you don't listen to the women in your life or because the women in your life doesn't trust you.
OP. I'm not American so this law doesn't affect abortion rights in my country, but I know one woman who has had an abortion and - this might be an outrageous thing for me to say - it would not have affected her life negatively if she hadn't had that abortion (she was married).

I'm not sure what you mean by "doesn't trust you". I presume abortion is a private issue that a woman only tells a tiny handful of very close confidants about. It's not like every woman who has an abortion announces it to everyone she knows.

My point still stands: the average voter, including women, in the average US state, will not be impacted by this ruling, especially as most states will probably still maintain abortion rights. For the average voter, trans demands, such as all the shit going on in their kids' school or allowing men to use women's changing rooms in the local gym, will have a much more direct effect on them. If the Democratic candidates in their state can't even use the word "woman" when talking about abortion rights, then they're not going to be able to use the abortion argument against the Republicans, especially if they're in a state where the Republicans are not seeking to ban abortion.

The states that are immediately banning abortion are already the more conservative states that Democrats struggle in. Here's a chance for Democrats in those states to maybe take some votes from Republican voters who believe in abortion rights. But they're not going to get very far if they can't say the word "woman".

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diotima1, Google [Bot] and 633 guests