Transsexuals

Locked
Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24801

Post by Guest »

Judith Butler is just trolling at this point.

Image

https://twitter.com/Octomare/status/1451908482324746249

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24802

Post by Guest »

Chips wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:19
Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:15
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... -SKIN.html

Radical and brave!
Oh FFS!
This seems fishy.

Image

I hope Maju remembers to descale regularly like "real women" apparently do? Nothing worse that going down on your woman and getting her scales stuck in your teeth. Am I right!

Image

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24803

Post by Guest »

Image

😭🤣😂😂

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24804

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:18
Chips wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:19
Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:15
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... -SKIN.html

Radical and brave!
Oh FFS!
This seems fishy.

Image

I hope Maju remembers to descale regularly like "real women" apparently do? Nothing worse that going down on your woman and getting her scales stuck in your teeth. Am I right!

Image
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24805

Post by Guest »

CTV of Canada has a five-part programme about children and youth who are assigned trans.

Just watched the first two parts - a transgender boy (i.e. girl) called Kian with an identical twin sister. The two twins were inseparable as babies and toddlers and even slept in the same crib for the first few years of their lives. Pop psychology suggests Kian was trying to distinguish herself from her identical female twin. Kian also has a girlfriend, so struggles with homosexuality probably also play a role. With all the usual threats of suicide if there was no transition, although there are few trans suicides.

Also in this episode, Keira Bell, Sinead Watson and Dr David Bell, who had been at the Tavistock gender clinic in London. Bell points out that most kids who seek to transition (or who are sent to transition) are struggling with being gay or lesbian. He also says that the supposed data for trans suicides or happy transitioners cannot be believed as it is driven by the powerful lobby of trans activists. The presenter says that some of the Canadian experts they spoke to believe many children are being rushed into transitioning but they declined to say that on camera for fear of being called transphobic.

Link to the programme:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/dramatic-incr ... -1.5633076

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24806

Post by Guest »

Margaret Atwood is attacking JK Rowling and Maya Forstater in an pathetic attempt to get the transloons, who are tearing her to pieces, to like her once again. She's a perfect example of why Twitter is not the place for nuanced debates and why just because we can all click on links that doesn't make us an expert.


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24807

Post by Guest »

Just saw this. A reminder why we should Leave Kids Alone.


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24808

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:42
Margaret Atwood is attacking JK Rowling and Maya Forstater in an pathetic attempt to get the transloons, who are tearing her to pieces, to like her once again. She's a perfect example of why Twitter is not the place for nuanced debates and why just because we can all click on links that doesn't make us an expert.
Image
https://twitter.com/DogShady/status/1452270659388719112

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24809

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:38
CTV of Canada has a five-part programme about children and youth who are assigned trans.

Just watched the first two parts - a transgender boy (i.e. girl) called Kian with an identical twin sister. The two twins were inseparable as babies and toddlers and even slept in the same crib for the first few years of their lives. Pop psychology suggests Kian was trying to distinguish herself from her identical female twin. Kian also has a girlfriend, so struggles with homosexuality probably also play a role. With all the usual threats of suicide if there was no transition, although there are few trans suicides.

Also in this episode, Keira Bell, Sinead Watson and Dr David Bell, who had been at the Tavistock gender clinic in London. Bell points out that most kids who seek to transition (or who are sent to transition) are struggling with being gay or lesbian. He also says that the supposed data for trans suicides or happy transitioners cannot be believed as it is driven by the powerful lobby of trans activists. The presenter says that some of the Canadian experts they spoke to believe many children are being rushed into transitioning but they declined to say that on camera for fear of being called transphobic.

Link to the programme:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/dramatic-incr ... -1.5633076
Thanks is this the program that was mentioned on the thread a few pages ago? About the detransitioners?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24810

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Oct 2021, 17:53
What do you think of this? This is very scary tbh. But I'm surprised she can't tell that it is a male before meeting him?
I can tell you that this would not happen to me.
I stopped being "nice" towards strangers a long time ago. I may be cordial and I may appear tolerant, but I keep strangers at arm's length. I don't invite people I'm not familiar with into my home. And I would never go alone to the home of someone I just met or barely know. And I also observe people from a distance: I notice how they present themselves, I pay attention to the sound of their voices; and since I know that transgenders have infiltrated lesbian spaces I take a good look at necks, hands, hips -- and crotch.

Whether we like it or not, as females we need to always have our guard up when we go on a date, and heed the instinctive internal "alarm" that lets us know when something doesn't feel right.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24811

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 19:31
Guest wrote:
23 Oct 2021, 17:53
What do you think of this? This is very scary tbh. But I'm surprised she can't tell that it is a male before meeting him?
I can tell you that this would not happen to me.
I stopped being "nice" towards strangers a long time ago. I may be cordial and I may appear tolerant, but I keep strangers at arm's length. I don't invite people I'm not familiar with into my home. And I would never go alone to the home of someone I just met or barely know. And I also observe people from a distance: I notice how they present themselves, I pay attention to the sound of their voices; and since I know that transgenders have infiltrated lesbian spaces I take a good look at necks, hands, hips -- and crotch.

Whether we like it or not, as females we need to always have our guard up when we go on a date, and heed the instinctive internal "alarm" that lets us know when something doesn't feel right.
SA. Tbh I'm not sure how true this story is, because many others also point out that something in her story sounds fishy and her posting history is strange and inconsistent. But assuming if this is true, I am shocked she doesn't even bother to video-call or meet up for a date first just to be sure? Also most trannies are very clockable and easily to detect, how can she not even tell something is wrong?

Most females should be like you. Not too nice and caring, to the point that it puts them at risk of being easily to manipulate and take advantage of. It's really important right now to keep your guard up even more and follow your gut feelings especially since the loony troons have invaded lesbian spaces.

Yes those body parts are dead giveaways whether its really a male or female, also I would add height, facial features (e.g. softness, roughness), jawlines, (males tend to have stronger jawlines it seems) and mouth area.

Also in my opinion, it should be okay to ask your date if the latter is "trans" or not.

GUEST
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24812

Post by GUEST »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:15
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... -SKIN.html

Radical and brave!
Guess the husband had a genital preference for a working one and moved on. Still, I think he would find the new one just as fishy :whistle:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24813

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:57
Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:38
CTV of Canada has a five-part programme about children and youth who are assigned trans.

Just watched the first two parts - a transgender boy (i.e. girl) called Kian with an identical twin sister. The two twins were inseparable as babies and toddlers and even slept in the same crib for the first few years of their lives. Pop psychology suggests Kian was trying to distinguish herself from her identical female twin. Kian also has a girlfriend, so struggles with homosexuality probably also play a role. With all the usual threats of suicide if there was no transition, although there are few trans suicides.

Also in this episode, Keira Bell, Sinead Watson and Dr David Bell, who had been at the Tavistock gender clinic in London. Bell points out that most kids who seek to transition (or who are sent to transition) are struggling with being gay or lesbian. He also says that the supposed data for trans suicides or happy transitioners cannot be believed as it is driven by the powerful lobby of trans activists. The presenter says that some of the Canadian experts they spoke to believe many children are being rushed into transitioning but they declined to say that on camera for fear of being called transphobic.

Link to the programme:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/dramatic-incr ... -1.5633076
Thanks is this the program that was mentioned on the thread a few pages ago? About the detransitioners?
This programme was mentioned a few pages back, so it could be the same one. It's more about children and young people and transitioning, including detransition.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24814

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:50
Just saw this. A reminder why we should Leave Kids Alone.

Aww, the three of them holding hands 🥺 I bet Vivienne didn't wanna go 😝

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24815

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:42
Margaret Atwood is attacking JK Rowling and Maya Forstater in an pathetic attempt to get the transloons, who are tearing her to pieces, to like her once again. She's a perfect example of why Twitter is not the place for nuanced debates and why just because we can all click on links that doesn't make us an expert.

Like i said before, she is trash, end of the story.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24816

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24817

Post by Guest »

How pathetic and gutless of Margaret Atwood wtf

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24818

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 23:16
How pathetic and gutless of Margaret Atwood wtf
she just have to look her twitter to understand but no she choose cowardise AND to be traitor. Fuck her and bless JK.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24819

Post by Guest »

They're so oppressed :rofl:




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24820

Post by Guest »

So disappointed in Atwood but she really seems out of touch with the debate. I wish she would have researched this stuff before she opened her mouth in support. I think if she would have read source material and really understood these arguments, she would be quite an asset to GC thinking. This whole thing is right up her alley….now she’s twisting out there alone trying to save face and throwing others under the bus. I am still going to hope she comes around.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24821

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 01:57
So disappointed in Atwood but she really seems out of touch with the debate. I wish she would have researched this stuff before she opened her mouth in support. I think if she would have read source material and really understood these arguments, she would be quite an asset to GC thinking. This whole thing is right up her alley….now she’s twisting out there alone trying to save face and throwing others under the bus. I am still going to hope she comes around.
I think she’s just a scared 80 year-old.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24822

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:16
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 01:57
So disappointed in Atwood but she really seems out of touch with the debate. I wish she would have researched this stuff before she opened her mouth in support. I think if she would have read source material and really understood these arguments, she would be quite an asset to GC thinking. This whole thing is right up her alley….now she’s twisting out there alone trying to save face and throwing others under the bus. I am still going to hope she comes around.
I think she’s just a scared 80 year-old.
Yep. Pretty shitty experience at her age. It makes me sick reading the abusive comments. Doesn’t mean she should be bringing up forsteter or Rowling though. “Heavy sigh”

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24823

Post by Guest »

I don’t like bashing elder women but it would be great if Atwood would quit Twitter. Women her age should have a spine and some dignity and she doesn’t.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24824

Post by Guest »

Interesting discussion on TIFs. I remember someone here a few weeks ago explaining how a lot of the young ones were into anime. I know nothing about anime or how it drives a lot of young women to want to transition so this was an eye opener for me. It’s bizarre.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24825

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:32
Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:19
Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 14:03
Is Atwood even that recognizable with the normies outside of the far left echo-chamber obsessed with the handmaiden thing? She's never been on my own radar before troonflix released that show, and I'm quite in touch with the feminist circles.

I'm only asking because I'm curious how many people are going to see the twitter shitshow presented by the stunning and brave girldick gang.
Not with the general public, but she's about as big as it gets in the literary establishment. Her books are pretty much blockbusters by the standards of literary fiction, she wins the highest prizes, and a number of her works besides The Handmaid's Tale will probably become classics and enter the "canon." She's about where Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie will likely be in thirty years.
I mean... I hear about Chimamanda way more often outside of the handmaiden fame, but the anon who commented on the older feminist generation is right, I think I should have been good twenty and some years older/hang out with older crowd that I have no other intersection with otherwise to see her actual readers who knew her before t-flix.
But as far as the mainstream popular consciousness goes, no I don't think people are noticing this on anything like the level that happened with Rowling. It's ultimately a pretty insular group that hangs on every word in literati Twitter.
I see. So essentially a single IG story from Ellen Page faking suicide on camera will probably overshadow the entire estrogen overdose freak show that happened over there.

I'll wait out a few days and will slip that into my social media where the straight wxmxn are to see what the ladies have to say (I expect crickets.)
Handmaid's Tale is on Hulu, not Netshit.

Yes, Netshit is still Netshit because they still have plenty of tranny homophobic content. Babysitter's Club promotes trooning kids. Dear White People degays lesbians. That Jake G-something from Brokeback Mountain was in a film where he's a gay character that "falls in love" with a female friend. Sabrina tried to help a TIF win a sports game through magic because biological differences are twanzphobic.

I can think of worse stuff Netshit has done, and though I abhorred Disney for being greedy shitbags, at least their content is still more "conservative", where they are just pro-gay and pro-women. Hope Disney fucks over Netshit. Their original content is so vastly horrible and they were more appealing when they had everything from other studios.

Amazon's fewer OG content is proportionately better. The one thing bad them is that they have Soloway's Transparent tranny show as OG content. Remember though, that Amazon continued to sell some GC books.

I will think better of Netshit once they take down those shitty shows and movies mentioned.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24826

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 07:55


What exactly is an "immutable" characteristic of trannies? Even referring to the old non-AGP ones? It was still a choice, and it was a mental illness one needed help with. We should be asked to "accept" that choice (but not give special treatment), not "tolerate" some "immutable trait", like how self-hating gay activists operated.

I am pretty sure trannies of 70s-80s would have also insisted that they had changed sexes, or would get offended if you misgendered them.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24827

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24828

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:42
Margaret Atwood is attacking JK Rowling and Maya Forstater in an pathetic attempt to get the transloons, who are tearing her to pieces, to like her once again. She's a perfect example of why Twitter is not the place for nuanced debates and why just because we can all click on links that doesn't make us an expert.

She is doing the same thing as that shit failure of a showrunner behind Wynonna Earp, after a character said something about women's biological function excluding men. Her show got cancelled in the end and that was so funny.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24829

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:45
Interesting discussion on TIFs. I remember someone here a few weeks ago explaining how a lot of the young ones were into anime. I know nothing about anime or how it drives a lot of young women to want to transition so this was an eye opener for me. It’s bizarre.
It's not even anime, it's some typical kpop/asian drama series shit, and whatever typical ugly-ass tumblr art style is the 4th attached picture???

Anime and trannies (TIMs meowing in their cat ears) overlap to an extent, but the mentally ill women chopping off their breasts aren't positively represented/(((affirmed))) in there.

I don't know how much trannies are represented in the current and upcoming anime since I don't watch it - most of it is just too mind-numbingly dumb, but every time an anime videogame gets a tranny character, the gender gang cries can be heard for like ten years after, see here:



Whoever that Helena person is she/he/it comes off as a dumb-ass white bigot because asian men weren't acting macho enough on camera and got her pussi self-IDying as Jimin for a moment, or whatever. Same big dumb-ass energy as the detransed bitch who was posted here some time ago who blamed tumblr feminism for hormonizing her brains. Always someone else's fault, but never 1) the trans lobby 2) the tumblr trannies 3) their porn addiction, anime in particular is such an amazing go-to scapegoat.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24830

Post by Guest »

Atwood. I'm not into nor follow general feminist or literary or artsy or lgbtq or mainstream TV world. But people/things I like (handful) tend to fall into those categories. By chance, I (one of those normies) happen to know Atwood (first read as a freshman long time ago) and Adichie (person I like introduced her, long before tranny thing) and Handmaiden (someone I like appeared here). Didn't Handmaiden reach wider attention?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24831

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 18:42
Margaret Atwood is attacking JK Rowling and Maya Forstater in an pathetic attempt to get the transloons, who are tearing her to pieces, to like her once again. She's a perfect example of why Twitter is not the place for nuanced debates and why just because we can all click on links that doesn't make us an expert.
I absolutely oppose hurling inhumane abuse - even to conservative women (although I see lots here thinking what they perceive as rightwing or not leftwing deserve every shit). At the same time, continued use of "naive, innocent gullible, be kind TRAs" is what is exactly enabling and strengthening the ever-growing TRA beasts.

Do you use the same "naive, innocent, gullible, be kind" adjective to those uneducated bible belt homophobic women who are naive in their stupidity and probably thinking that opposing sins is the way to be kind? If not, TRAs do not deserve any of those either. Same toxic damage they're causing to us women and lesbians and gays, however stupid and braindead these women are.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24832

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
24 Oct 2021, 23:16
How pathetic and gutless of Margaret Atwood wtf
Peak Cxnxdian culture lbr.
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 03:54
Atwood. I'm not into nor follow general feminist or literary or artsy or lgbtq or mainstream TV world. But people/things I like (handful) tend to fall into those categories. By chance, I (one of those normies) happen to know Atwood (first read as a freshman long time ago) and Adichie (person I like introduced her, long before tranny thing) and Handmaiden (someone I like appeared here). Didn't Handmaiden reach wider attention?
Handmaiden's tale was a big troonflix hit + the books have a sizeable cult following.

Adichie quote reading was featured on a beyonce album, which brought her quite a bit of recognition in 2013, and a few years after she spoken out on the tranny debate, which circulated as well.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24833

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 03:43
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:45
Interesting discussion on TIFs. I remember someone here a few weeks ago explaining how a lot of the young ones were into anime. I know nothing about anime or how it drives a lot of young women to want to transition so this was an eye opener for me. It’s bizarre.
It's not even anime, it's some typical kpop/asian drama series shit, and whatever typical ugly-ass tumblr art style is the 4th attached picture???

Anime and trannies (TIMs meowing in their cat ears) overlap to an extent, but the mentally ill women chopping off their breasts aren't positively represented/(((affirmed))) in there.

I don't know how much trannies are represented in the current and upcoming anime since I don't watch it - most of it is just too mind-numbingly dumb, but every time an anime videogame gets a tranny character, the gender gang cries can be heard for like ten years after, see here:



Whoever that Helena person is she/he/it comes off as a dumb-ass white bigot because asian men weren't acting macho enough on camera and got her pussi self-IDying as Jimin for a moment, or whatever. Same big dumb-ass energy as the detransed bitch who was posted here some time ago who blamed tumblr feminism for hormonizing her brains. Always someone else's fault, but never 1) the trans lobby 2) the tumblr trannies 3) their porn addiction, anime in particular is such an amazing go-to scapegoat.
Reading some of the comments, that troon is complaining about a female character who is NOT trans. It's like they haven't even played the game. To summarize her character (taken from wiki):
These troons obsessed with anime always ignores the sexism and cultural differences. They jump straight to the "girl short hair = trans" and "boy long hair = also trans"

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24834

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 03:07
Someday, when they put down the gender crack pipe, they're going to realize that they weren't reinventing the wheel.

Image

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24835

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:16
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 01:57
So disappointed in Atwood but she really seems out of touch with the debate. I wish she would have researched this stuff before she opened her mouth in support. I think if she would have read source material and really understood these arguments, she would be quite an asset to GC thinking. This whole thing is right up her alley….now she’s twisting out there alone trying to save face and throwing others under the bus. I am still going to hope she comes around.
I think she’s just a scared 80 year-old.
No, she's just another fucking crazy woke left-winger. She isn't only OK with trans cult she is devoted supporter.

What happened a couple days was because of her getting old and don't realising what saying probabs.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24836

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 03:43
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:45
Interesting discussion on TIFs. I remember someone here a few weeks ago explaining how a lot of the young ones were into anime. I know nothing about anime or how it drives a lot of young women to want to transition so this was an eye opener for me. It’s bizarre.
It's not even anime, it's some typical kpop/asian drama series shit, and whatever typical ugly-ass tumblr art style is the 4th attached picture???

Anime and trannies (TIMs meowing in their cat ears) overlap to an extent, but the mentally ill women chopping off their breasts aren't positively represented/(((affirmed))) in there.

I don't know how much trannies are represented in the current and upcoming anime since I don't watch it - most of it is just too mind-numbingly dumb, but every time an anime videogame gets a tranny character, the gender gang cries can be heard for like ten years after, see here:



Whoever that Helena person is she/he/it comes off as a dumb-ass white bigot because asian men weren't acting macho enough on camera and got her pussi self-IDying as Jimin for a moment, or whatever. Same big dumb-ass energy as the detransed bitch who was posted here some time ago who blamed tumblr feminism for hormonizing her brains. Always someone else's fault, but never 1) the trans lobby 2) the tumblr trannies 3) their porn addiction, anime in particular is such an amazing go-to scapegoat.
oh, for fuck's sake. Quit it with the "white bigot" shit. You sound like the TRAs talking about how white colonizers invented biological sex and how TERFs are all white women with endless white privilege

Better to just say she fetishizes Asian men.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24837

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 04:21
Reading some of the comments, that troon is complaining about a female character who is NOT trans. It's like they haven't even played the game.
Image

to be entirely fair, I haven't played that game either, but that would be the only actual intersection of anime and tranny subcultures I can think of where the uproar has been going on for ten years and counting, and every time they're screaming transphobia (basically a google search of "atlus + transphobia" or "persona + transphobia" will give you enough other examples.) We love to see a cis character appropriated for convenience!
These troons obsessed with anime always ignores the sexism and cultural differences. They jump straight to the "girl short hair = trans" and "boy long hair = also trans"
I guess I'm just happy that the asian tomboy subculture seems to be less affected by the gender woowoo than Ellen Page and the like, and I hope that will never change tbh.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24838

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:21
oh, for fuck's sake. Quit it with the "white bigot" shit. You sound like the TRAs talking about how white colonizers invented biological sex and how TERFs are all white women with endless white privilege[/quote]

If you are a) white b) north american you're the part of the problem. You, your bigotry, your TRAs, your feminism on the entire spectrum from right to left to BIPOQ2S5GQWERTY-inclusive, you can't respond to a stereotype being called out with anything but slapping me with whatever stereotype your damaged brain conveniently slips in.
Better to just say she fetishizes Asian men.
"Better" for whom, TRA voices in your head? I don't give a shit about nuance in that particular instance, she delegates responsibility for her transing choices to men who don't look like your bruh-bros, leaving her clitty identifying as Jimin until her shrink changed her protocol and her tranny delusion has ended with it.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24839

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:23
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 04:21
Reading some of the comments, that troon is complaining about a female character who is NOT trans. It's like they haven't even played the game.
Image

to be entirely fair, I haven't played that game either, but that would be the only actual intersection of anime and tranny subcultures I can think of where the uproar has been going on for ten years and counting, and every time they're screaming transphobia (basically a google search of "atlus + transphobia" or "persona + transphobia" will give you enough other examples.) We love to see a cis character appropriated for convenience!
These troons obsessed with anime always ignores the sexism and cultural differences. They jump straight to the "girl short hair = trans" and "boy long hair = also trans"
I guess I'm just happy that the asian tomboy subculture seems to be less affected by the gender woowoo than Ellen Page and the like, and I hope that will never change tbh.
Whenever TRAs talk about "trans" characters in anime or japanese games, always take it with the tiniest grain of salt. Because they're usually talking about androgynous characters.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24840

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:34
Whenever TRAs talk about "trans" characters in anime or japanese games, always take it with the tiniest grain of salt. Because they're usually talking about androgynous characters.
Have trannies reclaimed visual kei already by the way?

Image

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24841

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:20
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:16
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 01:57
I think she’s just a scared 80 year-old.
No, she's just another fucking crazy woke left-winger. She isn't only OK with trans cult she is devoted supporter.

What happened a couple days was because of her getting old and don't realising what saying probabs.
x2 Just like a crazy fundamental rightwing homophobe who's not only OK with her religious cult but also a devoted homophobic cause supporter can never be called... just a scared 80 year old.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24842

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:48
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:34
Whenever TRAs talk about "trans" characters in anime or japanese games, always take it with the tiniest grain of salt. Because they're usually talking about androgynous characters.
Have trannies reclaimed visual kei already by the way?
Lol wouldn't be surprised if they did. Wasn't there a Chinese(?) androgynous female group that TRAs claimed to be trans/nonbinary?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24843

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:59
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:48
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:34
Whenever TRAs talk about "trans" characters in anime or japanese games, always take it with the tiniest grain of salt. Because they're usually talking about androgynous characters.
Have trannies reclaimed visual kei already by the way?
Lol wouldn't be surprised if they did. Wasn't there a Chinese(?) androgynous female group that TRAs claimed to be trans/nonbinary?
I wonder if there ever was any asian cultural export with the tiniest, most momentary relevancy that TRAs have not claimed as a major trans culture cornerstone at this point :nails:

the bio trans girl Kikomi really embodied it all.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24844

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:26
I don’t like bashing elder women but it would be great if Atwood would quit Twitter. Women her age should have a spine and some dignity and she doesn’t.
One problem is she's just throwing out links, without attempting to articulate her own position or thinking. If she actually said something like "biological sex is real and meaningful and women should not be erased but we should also listen to trans people" then that would still be mealy-mouthed but at least she'd be saying something.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24845

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 07:00
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:26
I don’t like bashing elder women but it would be great if Atwood would quit Twitter. Women her age should have a spine and some dignity and she doesn’t.
One problem is she's just throwing out links, without attempting to articulate her own position or thinking. If she actually said something like "biological sex is real and meaningful and women should not be erased but we should also listen to trans people" then that would still be mealy-mouthed but at least she'd be saying something.
DA. She, this intellectual, doesn't believe it, hence her hysterical attacks on Rowing for saying exactly that in the most uncomplicated ways that children can understand.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24846

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:00
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 03:07
Someday, when they put down the gender crack pipe, they're going to realize that they weren't reinventing the wheel.

Image
Why do they always dye their hair like this?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24847

Post by Guest »

I'm new enough to all this. I took a small interest in trans a couple years back when I came across a girl who wanted to be a boy on YT, my interest was in the experience. I empathised, I sympathised, I learned some things and moved on. Then about a year or two ago someone said something that I can't recall but it made absolutely no sense to me, some comment made to show their support of trans rights by calling something transphobic. I honestly thought I had misheard the comment. Now, I'm not so sure because I recently witnessed an actual argument over whether or not a lesbian refusing to have sex with a trans woman was transphobic. This person was actually convinced, utterly, that a lesbian woman refusing sex with a trans woman amounted to transphobia. My head spun. I couldn't believe English was her native language, surely she was misreading the print in her head! Then I read about JKR. What she said was fine. Then I read about Harry and Hermione and the rest of them speaking out against her, what?! Then Stephen King, say it isn't so...I don't know what is going on. I really don't. The world has gone mad. Like crackers.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24848

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:50
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 05:20
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:16
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 01:57
I think she’s just a scared 80 year-old.
No, she's just another fucking crazy woke left-winger. She isn't only OK with trans cult she is devoted supporter.

What happened a couple days was because of her getting old and don't realising what saying probabs.
x2 Just like a crazy fundamental rightwing homophobe who's not only OK with her religious cult but also a devoted homophobic cause supporter can never be called... just a scared 80 year old.
to be fair, the kinda abuse you get for being a TERF cannot be compared to the abuse a right wing woman gets. Actually, in this case, no one is terrorizing a woman to be more "right wing", but she may be terrorized by the left again

But again, right wing women have the support of fellow right women and also men. They can't be canceled, because as seen with Gina Carano, she just got rehired back by Ben Shapiro.

Leftist women, however... If you don't completely follow the dogma, you will be cast out with no support system as you get relentlessly attacked. To make things worse, she isn't even siding with TERFs, to have a much smaller support network. She's just... On her own.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24849

Post by Guest »

True Gina Corano who I have no issue with doesn't get harassed by "right wing" people for her views - she has support and doesn't feel guilty for not being more inclusive and the like. Some left wing women end up feeling guilty over their views about the transformers.

Even in politics- in the anyone critical in the Labour party as not supported by their colleagues. Conservative party critical women don't suffer the same harassment within their party. Lisa Townsend was condemned by the Conservative party for going to the LGB Alliance conference. Imagine if that had been an elected Labour politician!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#24850

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 07:18
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 07:00
Guest wrote:
25 Oct 2021, 02:26
I don’t like bashing elder women but it would be great if Atwood would quit Twitter. Women her age should have a spine and some dignity and she doesn’t.
One problem is she's just throwing out links, without attempting to articulate her own position or thinking. If she actually said something like "biological sex is real and meaningful and women should not be erased but we should also listen to trans people" then that would still be mealy-mouthed but at least she'd be saying something.
DA. She, this intellectual, doesn't believe it, hence her hysterical attacks on Rowing for saying exactly that in the most uncomplicated ways that children can understand.
I just learned that the handmaiden tale is not a one-off feminist superhit series from the past - it's actually still ongoing, with that slightly nutty scientologist Elizabeth Moss upgraded to a producer role.

I highkey want the trannies to cancel on this fucking show just to spite Fartwood after she inserted JKR into her bullshit like nbd, because if you are a "feminist" but you have less solidarity with actual women in their struggle with the girldicks and some occasional tilapia-lined men, you should pay for that shit in this way or other.

Bye, Margaricia.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diotima1, Google [Bot] and 610 guests