Transsexuals

Locked
Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21951

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21952

Post by Guest »






Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21953

Post by Guest »




Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21954

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21955

Post by Guest »

Thread


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21956

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 13:26
How does that work with him also supporting gender self-id? The trans-captured Independent of course writes about this in terms of "exclusion".

guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21957

Post by guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21958

Post by Guest »

Whenever I talk to a TRA it really feels like talking to a super religious person.

You say "I don't have the same beliefs as you" and they either scream about how you're a terrible person (AKA you're going to hell) or they use it as a chance to proselytize and proceed to talk absolute bollocks.

They'll be like, "oh I guess you just don't understand but I can explain it for you in a super easy way!" and it's just nonsense lmao.

There's no difference to me between a Mormon enthusiastically telling me all about how Joseph Smith translated those plates and a TRA explaining how "transwomen are women and always have been and sex actually doesn't exist" etc. None of it is rooted in observable reality. It's a belief system.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21959

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 18:30
Whenever I talk to a TRA it really feels like talking to a super religious person.

You say "I don't have the same beliefs as you" and they either scream about how you're a terrible person (AKA you're going to hell) or they use it as a chance to proselytize and proceed to talk absolute bollocks.

They'll be like, "oh I guess you just don't understand but I can explain it for you in a super easy way!" and it's just nonsense lmao.

There's no difference to me between a Mormon enthusiastically telling me all about how Joseph Smith translated those plates and a TRA explaining how "transwomen are women and always have been and sex actually doesn't exist" etc. None of it is rooted in observable reality. It's a belief system.
You're lucky you even get an explanation, even if it's nonsense :rofl:
Most of my interactions with TRAs ended with them screeching and running away from the discussion.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21960

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 18:30
Whenever I talk to a TRA it really feels like talking to a super religious person.

You say "I don't have the same beliefs as you" and they either scream about how you're a terrible person (AKA you're going to hell) or they use it as a chance to proselytize and proceed to talk absolute bollocks.

They'll be like, "oh I guess you just don't understand but I can explain it for you in a super easy way!" and it's just nonsense lmao.

There's no difference to me between a Mormon enthusiastically telling me all about how Joseph Smith translated those plates and a TRA explaining how "transwomen are women and always have been and sex actually doesn't exist" etc. None of it is rooted in observable reality. It's a belief system.
A big sinister difference: the former is a laughing stock (stupid provincial unattractive ppl with no real influence) among the mainstream (desirable; packaged as the right way/side/thinking) or the educated, better-off (middle class and up), city people, those in better companies/orgs - all of those who influence, shape and change culture and mindset - and these are very TRA now.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21961

Post by Guest »

:hmmm: :lol:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21962

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 19:00
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 18:30
Whenever I talk to a TRA it really feels like talking to a super religious person.

You say "I don't have the same beliefs as you" and they either scream about how you're a terrible person (AKA you're going to hell) or they use it as a chance to proselytize and proceed to talk absolute bollocks.

They'll be like, "oh I guess you just don't understand but I can explain it for you in a super easy way!" and it's just nonsense lmao.

There's no difference to me between a Mormon enthusiastically telling me all about how Joseph Smith translated those plates and a TRA explaining how "transwomen are women and always have been and sex actually doesn't exist" etc. None of it is rooted in observable reality. It's a belief system.
A big sinister difference: the former is a laughing stock (stupid provincial unattractive ppl with no real influence) among the mainstream (desirable; packaged as the right way/side/thinking) or the educated, better-off (middle class and up), city people, those in better companies/orgs - all of those who influence, shape and change culture and mindset - and these are very TRA now.
DA Getting OT, but actually the Mormon church is extremely wealthy and has quite outsized influence relative to their actual numbers even if they are also made fun of. Mormons are highly overrepresented among elected officials in the US, for instance. And it's not like Mormons are the only proselytizing religion. If you don't think the Evangelical block has any influence, well lol.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21963

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21964

Post by Guest »

this is incredibly graphic, but important. Alix is brilliant. Didn't know Buck Angel is a pornographer.
guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 18:05

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21965

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21966

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21967

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 21:17
So this is what so many western countries are changing laws and language for? To accommodate these creeps? Someone needs to make a collection of all these confessions and send them to all the leaders in those countries for forced reading.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21968

Post by Guest »

Something bothers me in "MtF" they can't be female even after an all the chirurgy on earth. Why not say TiM instead? To me it's a better description.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21969

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 21:47
Something bothers me in "MtF" they can't be female even after an all the chirurgy on earth. Why not say TiM instead? To me it's a better description.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21970

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21971

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:45
here's the butchered quote

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21972

Post by Guest »

^chase strangio's handiwork.
Image

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21973

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:45
the shame omggg

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21974

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:54
^chase strangio's handiwork.
Image
She's a disrespectful pos.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21975

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:45
I CANT believe it. It's like to spit on her grave. :-/

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21976

Post by Guest »

I would love to sit down with Chase Strangio and have a discussion with her to see what's going through her mind. I'm not sure if she's sane.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21977

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 23:00
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:54
^chase strangio's handiwork.
Image
She's a disrespectful pos.
a complete fucking loon

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21978

Post by Guest »

Old tweet about the ACLU but relevant


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21979

Post by Guest »


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21980

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 23:06
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:45
I CANT believe it. It's like to spit on her grave. :-/
I agree. This really makes me angry and sad at the same time.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21981

Post by Guest »

Some say we are paranoid when it comes to "the erasure of women". I'm not into "oh that's Orwellian" every second, but I mean ... Fuck this is it!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21982

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 23:38
Some say we are paranoid when it comes to "the erasure of women". I'm not into "oh that's Orwellian" every second, but I mean ... Fuck this is it!
It really really is. On the one hand I know not to be surprised at anything they do at this point, but this is just an absolute disgrace.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21983

Post by Guest »

The future is [person] :dance2:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21984

Post by Guest »

Chase Strangio might unintentional peak more people with this nonsense.


Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21985

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 20:21
My sister-in-law is currently distraught over this. I know for a fact she's never met a single transwoman before so she's imagines they're all little dainty, poised creatures who simply want to blend into society and settle down with a nice man. Her husband, my brother, is less supportive because he's encountered the reality through his line of work.

I really hate how this is being reported everywhere as some discrimination against the poor Twans What Just Want To Pee. No regard for the safety of actual women and girls at all.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21986

Post by Guest »

This is probably gossipy and silly, but I read that Ellen Page is apparently on Raya (exclusive/celeb dating app)... Anyone know if he's looking for women, men, and/or both? I wouldn't even think to ask had I not seen people gushing about her wearing some green flower on her suit to the Met Gala, which is apparently an Oscar Wilde reference, and I'm just wondering if she's going all TIF gay "man" now

https://pagesix.com/2021/09/20/elliot-p ... d-on-raya/

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21987

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:49
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:45
here's the butchered quote

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21988

Post by Guest »

^ I'm sorry but Americans fucking deserve abortion ban or whatever conservatives are pushing for. Those people are less deranged than these Left nutjobs that lots of mainstream Dems/liberals/progressives have mindlessly supported with full vengeance ("TWAW! No debate! Fuck off anti-LGBTQ+ bigots!"). Those people have made these monsters grow. Without enablers, this cannot happen in this scale.

Even if some have never directly supported these specific quotes or incidents (too many to ignore though), they have always mindlessly supported loon things like ACLU and countless others, or rather, there have never really been the mass vocal and incessant protests anywhere from the mainstream Dem side against unhinged, sinister things that Dems are pushing for and/or supporting like this ACLU and all the equality/LGBTQ+ crap orgs, media, policies and politicians.

Even as foreign people not interested in American politics or news, we (like my parents) have gotten many news of multiple women's protests (because those were big and numerous) since Trump got elected, some mixture of Metoo and Trump.

Those people who keep saying nothing but "we have no alternatives but keep voting for Dems/Biden even if we only disagree with Equality Acts because the rest are only right/good": Sure. Then, right after he got elected, where have been the wide and loud protests to stop (twick, alter, destroy and make anew whatever) that monster Equality Acts? Oh right nothing as usual other than super minor voices vilified by those 'mainstream Dems'.

So these things have become norms... leading to constant incidents like Wi Spa, AOC/Cori, ACLU, etc. A few slowly peaking and continual fights don't change much fast enough when the loons and their supporters among the Left mainstream have already gotten very big and strong and unshaking.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21989

Post by Guest »

Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21990

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:01
Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.
x2

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21991

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:01
Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.
x2
ideological extremism of any political stripe is problematic. so tired of the deranged political commentator in here.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21992

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:11
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:01
Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.
x2
ideological extremism of any political stripe is problematic. so tired of the deranged political commentator in here.
X3 To a woman who might end up trapped in a worst case forced birth scenario this is not some "better option." TRA allies and right wingnuts will BOTH hurt vulnerable women, and that doesn't just suddenly become okay because one side isn't pro-trans.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21993

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:32
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:11
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:01
Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.
x2
ideological extremism of any political stripe is problematic. so tired of the deranged political commentator in here.
X3 To a woman who might end up trapped in a worst case forced birth scenario this is not some "better option." TRA allies and right wingnuts will BOTH hurt vulnerable women, and that doesn't just suddenly become okay because one side isn't pro-trans.
x4 is that person lecturing rightwing forums on supporting women and gay rights? I'm guessing no

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21994

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 20:15
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 19:00
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 18:30
Whenever I talk to a TRA it really feels like talking to a super religious person.

You say "I don't have the same beliefs as you" and they either scream about how you're a terrible person (AKA you're going to hell) or they use it as a chance to proselytize and proceed to talk absolute bollocks.

They'll be like, "oh I guess you just don't understand but I can explain it for you in a super easy way!" and it's just nonsense lmao.

There's no difference to me between a Mormon enthusiastically telling me all about how Joseph Smith translated those plates and a TRA explaining how "transwomen are women and always have been and sex actually doesn't exist" etc. None of it is rooted in observable reality. It's a belief system.
A big sinister difference: the former is a laughing stock (stupid provincial unattractive ppl with no real influence) among the mainstream (desirable; packaged as the right way/side/thinking) or the educated, better-off (middle class and up), city people, those in better companies/orgs - all of those who influence, shape and change culture and mindset - and these are very TRA now.
DA Getting OT, but actually the Mormon church is extremely wealthy and has quite outsized influence relative to their actual numbers even if they are also made fun of. Mormons are highly overrepresented among elected officials in the US, for instance. And it's not like Mormons are the only proselytizing religion. If you don't think the Evangelical block has any influence, well lol.
Let me know when religion runs the media, government, education, medicine, law, every goddamn thing else.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21995

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 04:03
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 20:15
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 19:00
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 18:30
Whenever I talk to a TRA it really feels like talking to a super religious person.

You say "I don't have the same beliefs as you" and they either scream about how you're a terrible person (AKA you're going to hell) or they use it as a chance to proselytize and proceed to talk absolute bollocks.

They'll be like, "oh I guess you just don't understand but I can explain it for you in a super easy way!" and it's just nonsense lmao.

There's no difference to me between a Mormon enthusiastically telling me all about how Joseph Smith translated those plates and a TRA explaining how "transwomen are women and always have been and sex actually doesn't exist" etc. None of it is rooted in observable reality. It's a belief system.
A big sinister difference: the former is a laughing stock (stupid provincial unattractive ppl with no real influence) among the mainstream (desirable; packaged as the right way/side/thinking) or the educated, better-off (middle class and up), city people, those in better companies/orgs - all of those who influence, shape and change culture and mindset - and these are very TRA now.
DA Getting OT, but actually the Mormon church is extremely wealthy and has quite outsized influence relative to their actual numbers even if they are also made fun of. Mormons are highly overrepresented among elected officials in the US, for instance. And it's not like Mormons are the only proselytizing religion. If you don't think the Evangelical block has any influence, well lol.
Let me know when religion runs the media, government, education, medicine, law, every goddamn thing else.
Do you not realize that, speaking specifically about evangelicals, they do have their own entire alternate media ecosystem? Outsiders may laugh at it because it tends to be cheesy af, but it's profitable and self-sustaining. They're like a quarter of the country after all, and in a nation of over 300 million that goes a long way. And also, they do run a lot of the government in many places. Hence the Texas abortion ban, and having enough religiously motivated anti-choice justices placed on the Supreme Court to uphold it.

None of this is to say that the TRA movement isn't also operating to do everything this thread has been talking about, but "actually extremist religion has no real meaningful influences or social consequences to be concerned about" is still just not a good take at all.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21996

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:45
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:32
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:11
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:01
Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.
x2
ideological extremism of any political stripe is problematic. so tired of the deranged political commentator in here.
X3 To a woman who might end up trapped in a worst case forced birth scenario this is not some "better option." TRA allies and right wingnuts will BOTH hurt vulnerable women, and that doesn't just suddenly become okay because one side isn't pro-trans.
x4 is that person lecturing rightwing forums on supporting women and gay rights? I'm guessing no
for me, I always bring up trannies online to get them to hate them more. I at least got them to gang up on a woke teenage tranny.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21997

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 04:27
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:45
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:32
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:11
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:01
Men trying to control women's bodies is "less deranged"?
People obsessed with black and white thinking are just as deranged as TRAs. And no, I'm not American.
x2
ideological extremism of any political stripe is problematic. so tired of the deranged political commentator in here.
X3 To a woman who might end up trapped in a worst case forced birth scenario this is not some "better option." TRA allies and right wingnuts will BOTH hurt vulnerable women, and that doesn't just suddenly become okay because one side isn't pro-trans.
x4 is that person lecturing rightwing forums on supporting women and gay rights? I'm guessing no
for me, I always bring up trannies online to get them to hate them more. I at least got them to gang up on a woke teenage tranny.
DA :nervous: Uh, was that teenager an actual predator, active enabler, or direct bully, or were they mostly just a dumb kid? Because I'm not interested in coddling others' delusions, but if you're just siccing organized vicious male troll brigades onto some teenager because they're into trans shit, that's not great.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21998

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 23:06
Guest wrote:
22 Sep 2021, 22:45
I CANT believe it. It's like to spit on her grave. :-/
Why?

The old bag supported dudes in women spaces.
Thanks to her dudes with wings now are allowed to women sports and single spaces. Thanks to her girls in schools restroom lost privacy and are losing shoolarships.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#21999

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 04:44
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 04:27
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:45
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:32
Guest wrote:
23 Sep 2021, 02:11
x2
ideological extremism of any political stripe is problematic. so tired of the deranged political commentator in here.
X3 To a woman who might end up trapped in a worst case forced birth scenario this is not some "better option." TRA allies and right wingnuts will BOTH hurt vulnerable women, and that doesn't just suddenly become okay because one side isn't pro-trans.
x4 is that person lecturing rightwing forums on supporting women and gay rights? I'm guessing no
for me, I always bring up trannies online to get them to hate them more. I at least got them to gang up on a woke teenage tranny.
DA :nervous: Uh, was that teenager an actual predator, active enabler, or direct bully, or were they mostly just a dumb kid? Because I'm not interested in coddling others' delusions, but if you're just siccing organized vicious male troll brigades onto some teenager because they're into trans shit, that's not great.
They were arguing over politics on social media and the teenager was a she/they tranny. I merely pointed out that it was a tranny, and men and women both attacked him and told him to go focus on deciding which bathroom to use.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Transsexuals

#22000

Post by Guest »


Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: diotima1, ffvideo, Google [Bot] and 634 guests