Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her lifeGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:09I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:05Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own wordsGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:54Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:46Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:41Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Taylor Schilling - Part V
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusiveGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:13Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special personGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:15You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:19You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
I don’t believe that. A special person can come in many forms, not just a lover.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:19You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
And TBH we really don’t know what she wants in a rs, which is part of the reason that quote is recycled so much. If you’re asking me I think She’s an overly complex person that can’t make decisions/ keep promises which can be very frustrating for the other party (in this case ER moving out to LA with taylor then something happening that she didn’t foresee)
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
For the longest time we accused her of BSing about this and she proved us wrongGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:02I love how this one interview always comes back to bite us in the ass between this and "If I was in a relationship I was happy with, I'd love to talk about it,"Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:46Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:41Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
I know it’s a gossip place but every time i see many pages I wonder if there was something new but as soon as I start page catching I end up realizing it’s the same broken records 🥲
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
THIS.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:25DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /sGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 23:37THIS.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:25DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:19You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Wow if u think about it , tanks killed 2 of her rs.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 00:23Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they sayGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 00:23Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
What did Tank do?Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 00:51Wow if u think about it , tanks killed 2 of her rs.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 00:23Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /sGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 23:37THIS.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:25DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:19
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Where were these people in 2018 when we were in a perpetual fanfic. Some of those fanfics are still brought up and believed to this day.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:04That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they sayGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 00:23Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /sGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 23:37THIS.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:25DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:19
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
You realize it is almost 2022? You need to stop living in the past, lmaoGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:10Where were these people in 2018 when we were in a perpetual fanfic. Some of those fanfics are still brought up and believed to this day.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:04That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they say
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Howdy hypocrite, lmaoGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:17You realize it is almost 2022? You need to stop living in the past, lmaoGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:10Where were these people in 2018 when we were in a perpetual fanfic. Some of those fanfics are still brought up and believed to this day.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:04That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they say
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
We need a new pic or something. Everybody’s getting weird.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Do you not have access to the internet? I don't have more info on her than anyone here, but maybe I paid attention. I don't have her quotes written down or systematized, so you're just gonna have to do your own search or trust me on this. It wasn't a written interview. It was either video or a podcast. I can't remember the date at all and I may be making up the context, but I'm a 99% sure the interviewer was a guy and they were talking about the Alex-Piper relationship; he asked her in general what she would do if she had a situation like that, would she try to fix it if "she's the love of your life" (or "soul mate"). She answered that she didn't know, that she didn't even know what that meant (either of those phrases). I remember exactly this statement because of how she phrased it. I'll try to find it when I have time, but really, I don't speculate based on boredom, but on her words and especially on the actions we've seen for years now.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:05Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own wordsGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:54Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:46Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:41Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
If you read above you’ll see the response to this exact quote (which was a written interview by the way) : this answer means she believe it exists just haven’t had it herselfGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 02:20Do you not have access to the internet? I don't have more info on her than anyone here, but maybe I paid attention. I don't have her quotes written down or systematized, so you're just gonna have to do your own search or trust me on this. It wasn't a written interview. It was either video or a podcast. I can't remember the date at all and I may be making up the context, but I'm a 99% sure the interviewer was a guy and they were talking about the Alex-Piper relationship; he asked her in general what she would do if she had a situation like that, would she try to fix it if "she's the love of your life" (or "soul mate"). She answered that she didn't know, that she didn't even know what that meant (either of those phrases). I remember exactly this statement because of how she phrased it. I'll try to find it when I have time, but really, I don't speculate based on boredom, but on her words and especially on the actions we've seen for years now.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 22:05Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own wordsGuest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:54Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:46Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”Guest wrote: ↑30 Nov 2021, 21:41Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
And already back home with her own pooch. It’s good that she’s living close enough and can just stop by to take her out after work. Also TJ keeping busyGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:51Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Is there any way you can give an idea on how to find the groomer on IG?
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
You know where she worksGuest I wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 05:02Is there any way you can give an idea on how to find the groomer on IG?
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Now you’re just shitstirringGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 06:42You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
We only got Tank's update. New one stargazing post from the groomer. None Taylor.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 01:55We need a new pic or something. Everybody’s getting weird.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 06:42You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
DA x2Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:30It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 06:42You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Just pointing out that this thread is embarrassing regardless.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:30It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 06:42You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
This comment literally made me It’s funny because it’s true.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:15Just pointing out that this thread is embarrassing regardless.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
So according to this logic, Taylor probably stayed with all her ex’s months longer than she should have. So Taylor has 4 relationships that were only decent for 3 months and 1 for a year. What a catch.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:30It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 06:42You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Wow some of you really are on another level. That is not what was implied at all in regards to all her relationships. The comment was some people stay in relationships even know they shouldn’t and they know that shouldn’t. But twist words and create whatever you think you’re readingGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:38So according to this logic, Taylor probably stayed with all her ex’s months longer than she should have. So Taylor has 4 relationships that were only decent for 3 months and 1 for a year. What a catch.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
So of course Taylor’s last relationship was the only one she stayed in longer than she should have. Gotcha.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:43Wow some of you really are on another level. That is not what was implied at all in regards to all her relationships. The comment was some people stay in relationships even know they shouldn’t and they know that shouldn’t. But twist words and create whatever you think you’re readingGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:38So according to this logic, Taylor probably stayed with all her ex’s months longer than she should have. So Taylor has 4 relationships that were only decent for 3 months and 1 for a year. What a catch.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:30It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 06:42You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.guest 122 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 03:47When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Some of you certainly have upped your fanfic game.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:52Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:52Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Eh, who knows. I did think the drive from nyc to la screamed "DON'T LEAVE ME", so yeah, ER was trying extra hard to keep Taylor.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 17:03Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:52Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Well saidGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 17:03Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:52Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
How do you go from “eh, who knows,” to more fanfic?Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 17:07Eh, who knows. I did think the drive from nyc to la screamed "DON'T LEAVE ME", so yeah, ER was trying extra hard to keep Taylor.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 17:03Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:52Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 16:22I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ERGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 15:40
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.
Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Man y’all are on a roll today, did the ER haters just heard the news or something?
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
It comes in waves… it’s also winding down longer than in the past because the relationship was so much longer. But we’ve been here before, it’s just a moment. Soon it will be Sahara againGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 18:06Man y’all are on a roll today, did the ER haters just heard the news or something?
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
This is the most tank content we’ve gotten in years! I forgot how cute she isGuest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 19:18We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
which account?Guest wrote: ↑01 Dec 2021, 19:18We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
I KNOW! Adorable.
Tank is getting so spoiled. and so are we
Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V
Tank about to become the dogfluencer she was born to be! Lmao