Taylor Schilling - Part V

Locked
Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53586

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:09
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:54
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:46
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:41
Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”
Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.
Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”
Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53587

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:13
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:09
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:54
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:46


Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”
Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.
Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”
Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53588

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:13
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:09
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:54

Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.
Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”
Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53589

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:13
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:09
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05


Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”
Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53590

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:13
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:09
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05


Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”
Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
I don’t believe that. A special person can come in many forms, not just a lover.

And TBH we really don’t know what she wants in a rs, which is part of the reason that quote is recycled so much. If you’re asking me I think She’s an overly complex person that can’t make decisions/ keep promises which can be very frustrating for the other party (in this case ER moving out to LA with taylor then something happening that she didn’t foresee)

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53591

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:02
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:46
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:41
Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”
I love how this one interview always comes back to bite us in the ass between this and "If I was in a relationship I was happy with, I'd love to talk about it," :lol:
For the longest time we accused her of BSing about this and she proved us wrong

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53592

Post by Guest »

I know it’s a gossip place but every time i see many pages I wonder if there was something new but as soon as I start page catching I end up realizing it’s the same broken records 🥲

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53593

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:13
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:09

I think they’re prob referring to the “idek what that means”
Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53594

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:13


Okay but doesn’t mean she doesn’t believe in this concept it means she never experienced it herself at that point of her life
You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53595

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15

You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
Wow if u think about it , tanks killed 2 of her rs. :blinkwide:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53596

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:15

You can believe in monogamy and still have commitment issues. Those two are not mutually exclusive
You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they say

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53597

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:51
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19


You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
Wow if u think about it , tanks killed 2 of her rs. :blinkwide:
What did Tank do?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53598

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:04
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:19


You sure can, what I am asking is why do you/OP think that Taylor doesn’t believe in the concept of having a special person
DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they say
Where were these people in 2018 when we were in a perpetual fanfic. Some of those fanfics are still brought up and believed to this day.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53599

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:10
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:04
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25


DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they say
Where were these people in 2018 when we were in a perpetual fanfic. Some of those fanfics are still brought up and believed to this day.
You realize it is almost 2022? You need to stop living in the past, lmao

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53600

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:17
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:10
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:04
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37


THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
That doesn’t make it right and that’s why there are enough people here that call them out on that with actual facts and receipts before newbies or casual readers believe what they say
Where were these people in 2018 when we were in a perpetual fanfic. Some of those fanfics are still brought up and believed to this day.
You realize it is almost 2022? You need to stop living in the past, lmao
Howdy hypocrite, lmao

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53601

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:06
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:51
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 00:23
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 23:37
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:25


DA. You’re looking for a proof where there isn’t any. The fact is that some people here have an idea of what they think Taylor is like so they’re riffing off of their own fan fiction.
THIS.
:rofl: Sure because this place hasn’t always been this way. /s
Wow if u think about it , tanks killed 2 of her rs. :blinkwide:
What did Tank do?
Farted on every partner’s pillow giving them pink eye

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53602

Post by Guest »

We need a new pic or something. Everybody’s getting weird.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53603

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:54
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:46
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:41
Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”
Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.
Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
Do you not have access to the internet? I don't have more info on her than anyone here, but maybe I paid attention. I don't have her quotes written down or systematized, so you're just gonna have to do your own search or trust me on this. It wasn't a written interview. It was either video or a podcast. I can't remember the date at all and I may be making up the context, but I'm a 99% sure the interviewer was a guy and they were talking about the Alex-Piper relationship; he asked her in general what she would do if she had a situation like that, would she try to fix it if "she's the love of your life" (or "soul mate"). She answered that she didn't know, that she didn't even know what that meant (either of those phrases). I remember exactly this statement because of how she phrased it. I'll try to find it when I have time, but really, I don't speculate based on boredom, but on her words and especially on the actions we've seen for years now.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53604

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 02:20
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 22:05
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:54
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:46
Guest wrote:
30 Nov 2021, 21:41
Jfc. She wasn’t gonna leave because she was trying to make it work. T hadn’t found “her special person”, though, because she doesn’t even believe in the concept. They were expecting different things from the beginning. They still tried.
Why would she want something she doesn’t believe exists? “By default I'm a monogamist. I want a partner in crime.”
Well, that’s her conflict. Monogamy almost never works for a short time. Most people expect a life long thing.
Let me rephrase then: where is the proof to this statement? I never came across anything remote to that from her own words
Do you not have access to the internet? I don't have more info on her than anyone here, but maybe I paid attention. I don't have her quotes written down or systematized, so you're just gonna have to do your own search or trust me on this. It wasn't a written interview. It was either video or a podcast. I can't remember the date at all and I may be making up the context, but I'm a 99% sure the interviewer was a guy and they were talking about the Alex-Piper relationship; he asked her in general what she would do if she had a situation like that, would she try to fix it if "she's the love of your life" (or "soul mate"). She answered that she didn't know, that she didn't even know what that meant (either of those phrases). I remember exactly this statement because of how she phrased it. I'll try to find it when I have time, but really, I don't speculate based on boredom, but on her words and especially on the actions we've seen for years now.
If you read above you’ll see the response to this exact quote (which was a written interview by the way) : this answer means she believe it exists just haven’t had it herself

guest 122
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53605

Post by guest 122 »

When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53606

Post by Guest »

Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53607

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:51
Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!
And already back home with her own pooch. It’s good that she’s living close enough and can just stop by to take her out after work. Also TJ keeping busy :spy:

Guest I
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53608

Post by Guest I »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 04:05
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:51
Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!
And already back home with her own pooch. It’s good that she’s living close enough and can just stop by to take her out after work. Also TJ keeping busy :spy:
Is there any way you can give an idea on how to find the groomer on IG?🤔

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53609

Post by Guest »

Guest I wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 05:02
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 04:05
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:51
Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!
And already back home with her own pooch. It’s good that she’s living close enough and can just stop by to take her out after work. Also TJ keeping busy :spy:
Is there any way you can give an idea on how to find the groomer on IG?🤔
You know where she works

Guest I
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53610

Post by Guest I »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 05:08
Guest I wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 05:02
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 04:05
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:51
Cute groomer and Tank all loved up at Taylors house!
And already back home with her own pooch. It’s good that she’s living close enough and can just stop by to take her out after work. Also TJ keeping busy :spy:
Is there any way you can give an idea on how to find the groomer on IG?🤔
You know where she works
Yes yes yes, thank you!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53611

Post by Guest »

guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53612

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42
guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
Now you’re just shitstirring

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53613

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 01:55
We need a new pic or something. Everybody’s getting weird.
We only got Tank's update. New one stargazing post from the groomer. None Taylor.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53614

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42
guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53615

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42
guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53616

Post by Guest »

Just pointing out that this thread is embarrassing regardless. :fool:

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53617

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42
guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53618

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:15
Just pointing out that this thread is embarrassing regardless. :fool:
This comment literally made me :lol: It’s funny because it’s true.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53619

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42
guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
So according to this logic, Taylor probably stayed with all her ex’s months longer than she should have. So Taylor has 4 relationships that were only decent for 3 months and 1 for a year. What a catch.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53620

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:38
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42

You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
So according to this logic, Taylor probably stayed with all her ex’s months longer than she should have. So Taylor has 4 relationships that were only decent for 3 months and 1 for a year. What a catch.
Wow some of you really are on another level. That is not what was implied at all in regards to all her relationships. The comment was some people stay in relationships even know they shouldn’t and they know that shouldn’t. But twist words and create whatever you think you’re reading

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53621

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:43
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:38
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30

It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
So according to this logic, Taylor probably stayed with all her ex’s months longer than she should have. So Taylor has 4 relationships that were only decent for 3 months and 1 for a year. What a catch.
Wow some of you really are on another level. That is not what was implied at all in regards to all her relationships. The comment was some people stay in relationships even know they shouldn’t and they know that shouldn’t. But twist words and create whatever you think you’re reading
So of course Taylor’s last relationship was the only one she stayed in longer than she should have. Gotcha.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53622

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42
guest 122 wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 03:47
When ER first posted her "my person" comments, and also said she'd found "her person", she also said that "they" were in love. Long time ago, but I still wondered if the input wasn't all just ER's emoting. I remember commenting that TS hadn't really put much into supporting ER's comments . . . , and was told that she "of course" was just as involved . . .then ER did that whole Pride Day tribute, and TS only answered in hearts. Nice, but it makes sense now, if everyone is reading the situation correctly. Not much about their rsmakes that much sense, except that at least one of the couple is very private. But don't you kind of know, in a relationship, that one is more into it than the other? After the honeymoon period, that is. Ignoring red flags for sure? Maybe one day we'll know for sure--until then, it's just a game.
You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53623

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:52
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42

You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.
:rofl: Some of you certainly have upped your fanfic game.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53624

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:52
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 06:42

You better be careful, you aren't allowed to think anything but that she was madly in love with ER in here lol.
It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.
Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53625

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 17:03
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:52
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30

It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.
Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…
Eh, who knows. I did think the drive from nyc to la screamed "DON'T LEAVE ME", so yeah, ER was trying extra hard to keep Taylor.

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53626

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 17:03
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:52
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:30

It must pain you to know that she may actually loved the girl.
DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.
Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…
Well said

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53627

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 17:07
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 17:03
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:52
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 16:22
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 15:40

DA x2
The narrative of some to downplay facts in this thread is embarassing, they did the same with Carrie and then Holly but it's ridiculous to read comments about a 2 yrs relationship stating Taylor has never been in love.
They're good only at hiding all the moments proved Taylor was really into ER and she has has been the first partner showed on sm.

Breakups happen but the delusion to think Taylor shared 2 yrs of her life with someone she wasn't in love with, it's the real fanfiction.
I’m not saying she didn’t care for ER but people stay in relationships all the time when they know they shouldn’t or don’t want to be in. Point is we have no idea what the relationship was really like, we really don’t know how into each other they were. I take Taylor showing that pride pic with a grain of salt, she didn’t hide Holly, she just didn’t splash her all over her IG. She is a private person and I think that pride picture was all ER
Exactly. I picked up lot of manipulative things from ER not only the pride picture. Another reason Taylor may have stayed as long as she did if she was doing other things to manipulate Tay. We just do not know. I do think ER was not, and did not let Tay go without fighting hard to keep her. Something the other 3 women exes didn't lower themselves to even attempt.
Or Emily may have stayed with Taylor as long as she did because of her manipulations. Or there weren’t any at all. I think it’s ridiculous to write a whole fanfic and throw a “may” in there. There are endless possibilities but nothing to suggest that it actually happened and also no way of us to ever find out…
Eh, who knows. I did think the drive from nyc to la screamed "DON'T LEAVE ME", so yeah, ER was trying extra hard to keep Taylor.
How do you go from “eh, who knows,” to more fanfic?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53628

Post by Guest »

Man y’all are on a roll today, did the ER haters just heard the news or something?

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53629

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 18:06
Man y’all are on a roll today, did the ER haters just heard the news or something?
It comes in waves… it’s also winding down longer than in the past because the relationship was so much longer. But we’ve been here before, it’s just a moment. Soon it will be Sahara again

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53630

Post by Guest »

We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53631

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:18
We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
This is the most tank content we’ve gotten in years! I forgot how cute she is

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53632

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:18
We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
which account? :wub:

guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53633

Post by guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:21
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:18
We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
which account? :wub:
Nevermind, I found it. So effing cute, both of them!

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53634

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:18
We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
This is the most tank content we’ve gotten in years! I forgot how cute she is
I KNOW! Adorable.
Tank is getting so spoiled. and so are we

Guest
Reactions:

Re: Taylor Schilling - Part V

#53635

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:27
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:20
Guest wrote:
01 Dec 2021, 19:18
We could talk about tank getting a bath from the groomer and start speculating about that relationship again…groomer or girlfriend hahaha gotta love lchat
This is the most tank content we’ve gotten in years! I forgot how cute she is
I KNOW! Adorable.
Tank is getting so spoiled. and so are we
Tank about to become the dogfluencer she was born to be! Lmao

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Brie, ffvideo and 368 guests